Do routing BGs have a restricted area

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Do routing BGs have a restricted area

Post by hammy »

Simple enough, do broken BGs exert a restricted area?

I couldn't find anything that said they don't
marshalney2000
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:14 am

Post by marshalney2000 »

Hammy like you I cannot see anything to the contrary but equally do not believe it it would be logical for them to have one. I think they would have other things on their mind.
John
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

marshalney2000 wrote:Hammy like you I cannot see anything to the contrary but equally do not believe it it would be logical for them to have one. I think they would have other things on their mind.
John
I agree that it seemed odd and to be honest normally routers are not heading for the action but one of Dave's cavaly BGs ended up routing in a very 'interesting' direction.
lawrenceg
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Former British Empire

Post by lawrenceg »

I think being about to have a herd of panic-sticken stampeding horses gallop over you would still concentrate the mind sufficiently to constrain your movement. Mind you, remaining in front of them wouldn't be top of my priority list.

Perhaps you could rationalise it as the troops deciding to stick around and slaughter the routers rather than engage in any fancy manoeuvring.

Whatever the reason, the rules don't allow you to ignore the restricted area of routers. The only exemption is battle troops pinned by skirmishers.
Lawrence Greaves
SirGarnet
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2186
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:13 am

Post by SirGarnet »

lawrenceg wrote:I think being about to have a herd of panic-sticken stampeding horses gallop over you would still concentrate the mind sufficiently to constrain your movement. Mind you, remaining in front of them wouldn't be top of my priority list.

Perhaps you could rationalise it as the troops deciding to stick around and slaughter the routers rather than engage in any fancy manoeuvring.
Yes, that makes sense, unless the restricted area movement restrictions in a particular case led to a BG that is partially blocking routers being prevented from moving to completely block the routers and thereby terminate them in the later joint action phase, such as a routing BG turning 90 degreees towards its baseline in rout after preventing its opponent from moving round to that side to block the rout via the restricted area rule. Although the first para above could explain it.
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

How would the BG in front of the routers actually know they were routing?

All they would see is horsemen charging towards them. "Watch what you're doing with that lance son, you could have someone's eye out with that"
kal5056
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 11:35 pm

Post by kal5056 »

The girlish screams might give them away.
Gino
SMAC
sagji
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 567
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by sagji »

Logically broken, and fragmented, BGs should not have a restricted area.
The argument that the broken BG does have one because of the being in the path of the rout fails because the path of the rout is not determined by the direction faced.
lawrenceg
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Former British Empire

Post by lawrenceg »

sagji wrote:Logically broken, and fragmented, BGs should not have a restricted area.
The argument that the broken BG does have one because of the being in the path of the rout fails because the path of the rout is not determined by the direction faced.
The logic of the wording written in the rules is that they do have a restricted area.
Lawrence Greaves
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

lawrenceg wrote:
sagji wrote:Logically broken, and fragmented, BGs should not have a restricted area.
The argument that the broken BG does have one because of the being in the path of the rout fails because the path of the rout is not determined by the direction faced.
The logic of the wording written in the rules is that they do have a restricted area.
I agree with both statements. I thought that they shouldn't but when I checked the rules they do. It is not a massive issue and I can honestly not think of a single game prior to the one I played yesterday where the situation cropped up.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”