rear support

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
bahdahbum
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:40 pm

rear support

Post by bahdahbum »

From the french spoeaking forum :

Do the supported unit have to SEE the suporting unit ( the supporting unit is in a wood, plantation , behind a hill ,... but within the 8 or 12 MU ) .
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

As far as I am concerned they just have to be there. The rules say nothing about visibility for support, just: distance, troop type supporting/supported, facing and numbers.
shall
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 6137
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:52 am

Post by shall »

No.

We considered that in general troops would have reasonable awareness of where friends were. Otherwise you end up with some horrible vsisbility issues to deal with.

Si
Simon Hall
"May your dice roll 6s (unless ye be poor)"
marioslaz
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy

Post by marioslaz »

philqw78 wrote:As far as I am concerned they just have to be there. The rules say nothing about visibility for support, just: distance, troop type supporting/supported, facing and numbers.
I would say the same, too. Still, this is not a silly question: it's enough to suppose your support should be there? Of course it's just a platonic question, since for me it's not important for game purpose.
Mario Vitale
bahdahbum
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:40 pm

Post by bahdahbum »

It was just to be sure !

It might lead to some interesting situation if the terrain between the 2 units is an impassable mountain 8)
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28413
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

bahdahbum wrote:It was just to be sure !

It might lead to some interesting situation if the terrain between the 2 units is an impassable mountain 8)
Indeed, but this is another example of a situation in which we decided not to complicate the rules.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

if the terrain between the 2 units is an impassable mountain
Well they would at least feel that their rear was secure
MadBanker
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:44 pm
Location: Mons (Belgium)

Post by MadBanker »

philqw78 wrote:
if the terrain between the 2 units is an impassable mountain
Well they would at least feel that their rear was secure
Or... they could feel trapped :wink:
marioslaz
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy

Post by marioslaz »

MadBanker wrote:
philqw78 wrote:
if the terrain between the 2 units is an impassable mountain
Well they would at least feel that their rear was secure
Or... they could feel trapped :wink:
I would say the same, but luckily I never found in this situation! :wink:
Mario Vitale
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”