Antigonid rescue services rush to the scene: But alas, they were not in time......

Moderator: Pocus
Politeness.costs nothing.....
A career in PR awaits I suspect.......Geffalrus wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:32 pm Tragedy in the Aegean! The Antigonid Royal News reports a terrible accident off the coast of Troy. Drunk on Greek wine stolen from the concession stand at the Troy Museum, the Pictish navigator of Caledonian Cruiselines ran into some rocks and sank the flimsy craft. There were no survivors.
Antigonid rescue services rush to the scene:
Rescue.jpg
But alas, they were not in time......![]()
Tragedy.jpg
Not deliberately sabotaging Jerusalem out of spite costs nothing...devoncop wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 7:12 pmPoliteness.costs nothing.....
Funnily enough that situation closely resembles the situation in Petra after the "accidental" attack and capture by the Judean Army a few years back...
I am sure the two facts are not in any way related
In any case you should be in Jerusalem before the buildings collapse if you stick to the timetable....
ah, and there is the error. The cowardly Berlix did indeed survive, and will no doubt have much to tell at the next round of the Itunae book festival (with carved stones) when he finally arrivesGeffalrus wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:32 pm Tragedy in the Aegean! The Antigonid Royal News reports a terrible accident off the coast of Troy. Drunk on Greek wine stolen from the concession stand at the Troy Museum, the Pictish navigator of Caledonian Cruiselines ran into some rocks and sank the flimsy craft. There were no survivors.
...
Dude, not cool. Taunting him with the disassembly is one thing since that's reversible and non-permanent if you stop it in time. But the food sabotage is a humanitarian crisis with longer term consequences, none of which were part of the treaty agreement.
devoncop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 5:06 am To show restraint and goodwill Egypt will put the farmers back to work.
However .......private demands by Judea to take an extra region on the Red Sea in addition to what was agreed in the peace deal (which prompted this action) must be withdrawn immediately.....otherwise Egypt reserves the right to deal with Jerusalem as it sees fit whatever the consequences. This will include up to and beyond the option of simply abandoning Samaria to the Seleucids and the any other areas of Palestine under Egyptian rule from Jerusalem) and defending Jerusalem from Judea assault.
This demand came as a result of Ptolemy's premature conquest of Samaria which Judea wished compensation for, upon which Ptolemy replied:devoncop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 5:06 am To show restraint and goodwill Egypt will put the farmers back to work.
However .......private demands by Judea to take an extra region on the Red Sea in addition to what was agreed in the peace deal (which prompted this action) must be withdrawn immediately.....otherwise Egypt reserves the right to deal with Jerusalem as it sees fit whatever the consequences. This will include up to and beyond the option of simply abandoning Samaria to the Seleucids and the any other areas of Palestine under Egyptian rulers from Jerusalem) and defending Jerusalem from Judean/Seleucid assault.
However, seeing as how the premature conquest of Samaria has led to Nabatean conquest of Galilea and destruction of Judea's army attempting to liberate Jerusalem, this claim is false. Judea has indeed lost out due to Ptolemy's premature action.There is no compensation due to Judea as Egypt has taken a region that it was agreed she could take and abandoned the region it was agreed she would abandon.
The matter of timing is one in which the Judean and Egyptian position differs but which is essentially irrelevant in the greater scheme of things. Judea has lost nothing and Egypt has gained nothing either way.
While Nabatea's actions are indeed outside of Egyptian control, Egypt is still responsible for the actions of her vassals. If Ptolemy wishes to entirely remove his responsibility for Nabatea's actions, he would have to revoke his protection as well, and while Judea would not complain in that eventuality, Judea does find that eventuality highly unlikely.devoncop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 11:30 amAll demolition of Jerusalem's facilities has already been stopped and food production resumed.
A garrison has however been placed in the city which will remain until the demand for a further Red Sea region is withdrawn.
The actions of Nabatea are (as Judea is well aware) outside of the control of Egypt.
Egypt will await the Judean clarification.....however it needs to be understood that as per the agreement made there will be no monetary payments going from the Egyptian treasury to the Judean one. Indeed given the recent large payments made to Judea from her sponsors Judea is hardly "out of pocket"
That confused me initially too....I put that to the Antigonids and they denied sending money......
Indeed!devoncop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 2:31 pmThat confused me initially too....I put that to the Antigonids and they denied sending money......
The screenshot actually says "Antigonus of the Seleucids" sent the money. If I remember correctly the Seleucids are now being ruled by a ruler called Antigonus !
On such misunderstandings world wars have started![]()
So does Ptolemy approve of this compromise?Yaitz331 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 12:09 pmJudea's compromise suggestion is this: Seeing as how Judea's two reasons for wanting the extra region are to form the province and remove an Arabian region in Judea's rear, taking the region, forming the province, and then abandoning the region will satisfy both of Judea's wishes and be entirely acceptable to Ptolemy. As that will leave Judea with two of the four regions of the province, the province will not be destroyed by this abandonment.
I see EVERYTHING on the map. Nothing is hidden from me.
Yaitz331 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 3:42 pmSo does Ptolemy approve of this compromise?Yaitz331 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 12:09 pmJudea's compromise suggestion is this: Seeing as how Judea's two reasons for wanting the extra region are to form the province and remove an Arabian region in Judea's rear, taking the region, forming the province, and then abandoning the region will satisfy both of Judea's wishes and be entirely acceptable to Ptolemy. As that will leave Judea with two of the four regions of the province, the province will not be destroyed by this abandonment.
This will satisfy Judea's wishes, and I see no reason why Ptolemy would object.