jimwinsor wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:12 am
I gather then the only remaining sticking point is Jerusalem. I can sympathize with the Judean position, a Judea without the Temple isn’t quite Judea.
Whilst Egypt admires the Seleucids capacity for optimism the text of our reply is clear the basis of the peace offers is the Antigonid Peace plan rather than the punitive measures proposed in the Seleucid document.
There is a willingness to allow Syria and Phoenicia provinces to be returned to Judean control but the Judeans cannot expect to regain Palaestina Province from Egypt when she has used it as a base to seize the capital of Nabatea earlier in the conflict.
Egypt is prepared to give monetary recompense to Judea to compensate her territorial losses as a gesture of goodwill but also it should be clear that if a nation is at war with her or her allies then they cannot expect Egypt not to financially support other nations fighting against the countries attacking her.
If on the other hand the Seleucids make peace with Egypt of course then no further payments will be made to nations fighting them.
The buffer state suggested by the Seleucids is acceptable to Egypt.
Egypt has no desire to take any further territory from Judea other than Palaestina Province and regarding Arabia her Red Sea bordering regions need to remain Arabian to provide Egypt a "buffer" of her own against Judean expeditions against her southern territories.
Hopefully this has clarified the position fully.
Egypt has absolutely no interest in any conflict with the Seleucids (or further conflict with Judea now they have been punished for their actions in seizing Petra) so it is hoped the peace offers are accepted.
Ptolemy, Pharoah of all Egypt.