Effective and maximum ranges

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
jlopez
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 589
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: Spain

Effective and maximum ranges

Post by jlopez »

Could someone check this is correct and if so the logic behind it?

AA
AA

....123
....123

A is a LH, bow BG. 123 is a longbow BG. A is angled so all bases are just within range and arc of file 1 but are not in front of it. File 1 is within arc and effective range of A. Since one base in the longbow BG can shoot at effective range, file 2's arc of fire is reduced to one base width to the side instead of two when firing at maximum range. As a result, the longbow unit with a weapon of greater range cannot inflict 1H3PB on A while it is itself vulnerable to A's shooting.

Julian
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28413
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Effective and maximum ranges

Post by rbodleyscott »

jlopez wrote:Could someone check this is correct and if so the logic behind it?

AA
AA

....123
....123

A is a LH, bow BG. 123 is a longbow BG. A is angled so all bases are just within range and arc of file 1 but are not in front of it. File 1 is within arc and effective range of A. Since one base in the longbow BG can shoot at effective range, file 2's arc of fire is reduced to one base width to the side instead of two when firing at maximum range. As a result, the longbow unit with a weapon of greater range cannot inflict 1H3PB on A while it is itself vulnerable to A's shooting.

Julian
It is correct.

Geometrically, given an arc of fire of x degrees, the width of the zone potentially covered by the arc of fire gets wider as the target gets further from the front of the shooting BG. This is represented in simplified form by the different arc of fire rules for effective and long range.

In this case, the target is not at long range from the front of the BG, (despite some of the LB bases being outside effective range), so the whole longbow BG gets the close range arc of fire. This corresponds to the above geometry.

With regard to your last comment, them's the breaks. There always going to potentially be situations like this if arcs are finite. Next turn, wheel the longbowmen to face the LH.
jlopez
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 589
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Effective and maximum ranges

Post by jlopez »

rbodleyscott wrote:
jlopez wrote:Could someone check this is correct and if so the logic behind it?

AA
AA

....123
....123

A is a LH, bow BG. 123 is a longbow BG. A is angled so all bases are just within range and arc of file 1 but are not in front of it. File 1 is within arc and effective range of A. Since one base in the longbow BG can shoot at effective range, file 2's arc of fire is reduced to one base width to the side instead of two when firing at maximum range. As a result, the longbow unit with a weapon of greater range cannot inflict 1H3PB on A while it is itself vulnerable to A's shooting.

Julian


It is correct.

Geometrically, given an arc of fire of x degrees, the width of the zone potentially covered by the arc of fire gets wider as the target gets further from the front of the shooting BG. This is represented in simplified form by the different arc of fire rules for effective and long range.

In this case, the target is not at long range from the front of the BG, (despite some of the LB bases being outside effective range), so the whole longbow BG gets the close range arc of fire. This corresponds to the above geometry.

With regard to your last comment, them's the breaks. There always going to potentially be situations like this if arcs are finite. Next turn, wheel the longbowmen to face the LH.
That of course is if you pass the CMT for undrilled within 6 inches of the enemy...but hey, I'm not bitter about it. No way. ;)

Julian
shall
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 6137
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:52 am

Post by shall »

As a result, the longbow unit with a weapon of greater range cannot inflict 1H3PB on A while it is itself vulnerable to A's shooting.
Only until you wheel and pile full firepower on it. You need to look at the equation over a few rounds not one isolated shot.It pretty realistic. The nimbler LH ride up from a directoin that minimises the shooting at them and has a pop. You then wheel and shoot them with 4 dice - uuch! If you take drilled LBw you are guaranteed revenge, if undrilled you have taken a risk of being swarmed which is very realsitic. Or put a general with the undrilled and get them anyway.

Over the single event it may look odd but over the sequenc of events it has all the richness of the different types I would suggest.

"A battle is not won or lost in a dice roll"

Si
Last edited by shall on Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Simon Hall
"May your dice roll 6s (unless ye be poor)"
gibby
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 337
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Northampton

Post by gibby »

Unless I'm misreading are you saying that all 4 lh can shoot therefore shoot with 2 dice and that files 1 and 2 of the longbow can shoot because its short range for 1. Surely that still means 3 shooting dice for the longbow and is therefore still capable of doing 1hp3b.

So I think the trick is not to be in front of file 1 but to the side and front of an imaginary element to 1's left which therefore means only file 1 fires. If thats what you said then ignore me.

cheers
Jim
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”