Khalkhin Gol

Moderators: Order of Battle Moderators, The Artistocrats

Post Reply
Zekedia222
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:30 pm
Location: Somewhere between Chattanooga and Anchorage

Khalkhin Gol

Post by Zekedia222 »

This is just a question to see how many would like to see a Khalkhin Gol / Nomonhan Incident campaign. Some people made a singular scenario, but I dont think that can accurately represent the entire campaign. It would likely be incredibly challenging from the Japanese side; the forces' strength is greatly unbalanced. The Japanese launched a 73 tank assault, the Soviets countered this with 450 tanks and armoured cars. Yeah, pretty unbalanced. Still have my research and notes on the matter, only have to rebuild the map.'

Anyone who wants the sources:

Soviet OoB, composition, equipment, and arrival times : http://www.armchairgeneral.com/rkkaww2/ ... n_cut1.pdf
IJA and Soviet AIr OoB, strength. composition, planes equipped, and arrival times : http://surfcity.kund.dalnet.se/nomonhan.htm
Klinger, you're dumber than you look, and THAT boggles the MIND.
- Charles Emerson Winchester III
Horst
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1927
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:22 pm

Re: Khalkhin Gol

Post by Horst »

As long as you don't have to fight 450 Soviet tank units, I'm all in for a Japanese challenge.
3-4 tank units per tank regiment should be enough scale. I also prefer 2 inf and 1 heavy-inf unit per infantry regiment. If there are too many divisions involved, I just leave some away - what is maybe also a good idea for a playble scenario against so many Soviet units.
Zekedia222
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:30 pm
Location: Somewhere between Chattanooga and Anchorage

Re: Khalkhin Gol

Post by Zekedia222 »

Those tank and armoured cars were part of several different tank and armoured battalions, so no there is not 450.
Problem is, Japanese had poor AT weaponry. While in this game that is solved by the AT made for artillery, there won't be sufficient AT Weaponry. I may Edit the post to show all units.

That's why I chose a Japanese perspective scenario versus a Soviet perspective scenario. A Japanese perspective would be far more challenging, as opposed to the Soviet steamroller that was the Soviet army at Khalkhin Gol.
Klinger, you're dumber than you look, and THAT boggles the MIND.
- Charles Emerson Winchester III
Horst
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1927
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:22 pm

Re: Khalkhin Gol

Post by Horst »

Defensive scenarios are always boring if you have superior forces. That’s what makes playing the Finns or Chinese interesting with their lack of own equipment.
I have read some words about this battle, but I have no idea about authentic maps to picture this battle in detail.
Post Reply

Return to “Order of Battle : World War II - Scenario Design”