Steve
Interpenetration question
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
stevoid
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 285
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Hey, my NKE Close (so-called) Fighters have had plenty of experience of going "Hmm, why are the Bowmen running our way. Oh. Knights. Urrrggg..."davem wrote:This "advantage" has already gleefully been pointed out to me......stevoid wrote:Dave, there is still an advantage of the allowed intepenetration: the HF won't get disrupted when the Bow have to rout through them
Steve![]()
Philistines, you're all Philistines......
Steve
Zombies: 100% Post-Consumer Human; Reduce - Reuse - Reanimate
(DM) Yup. In DBM my NKE would gleefully set about Kn armies, in FOG they are victims awaiting their accident:-(stevoid wrote:Hey, my NKE Close (so-called) Fighters have had plenty of experience of going "Hmm, why are the Bowmen running our way. Oh. Knights. Urrrggg..."davem wrote:This "advantage" has already gleefully been pointed out to me......stevoid wrote:Dave, there is still an advantage of the allowed intepenetration: the HF won't get disrupted when the Bow have to rout through them
Steve![]()
Philistines, you're all Philistines......
Steve
My experience is that FOG works best "in period" and Kn vs NKE etc. just doesn't work.
Harass the Kn with you chariots in single rank and evade away. Pull them out of the game. Destroy all support troops ith your fast moving drilled MF.(DM) Yup. In DBM my NKE would gleefully set about Kn armies, in FOG they are victims awaiting their accident:-(
My experience is that FOG works best "in period" and Kn vs NKE etc. just doesn't work.
Si
Simon Hall
"May your dice roll 6s (unless ye be poor)"
"May your dice roll 6s (unless ye be poor)"
Marc,davem wrote:OK, Marc, for you tonight the scribes will recount the heroic deeds of Pharoah Rammetuphem II and his sons Prince Notahope, Haatwishiteon and of course, Prince Imphotent.babyshark wrote:I don't care what you call them so long as we still get battle reports from the famous Pharaoh Ramittuppem. (I may have spelled his name incorrectly; forgive me, I am not that good at translating hieroglyphics.)nikgaukroger wrote: Apparantly not
Marc
As promised I wrote up last night's game in the AAR section. Enjoy!!
Rammettuphem II rides again.......
-
hazelbark
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
What defines "lots" of knights? 3 BGs of Knights plus 4 generals is half the points at 800. The real question with a lot of "knight" armies is what else do they have if the knights don't triumph.philqw78 wrote:All that drilled MF. Perhaps you just need to re-learn the interactions. But even then I don't hold out much hope against lots of Knights. How big are the MF battle groups?
3 BGs of 4 knights each is a 12 wide frontage of knights. If that was pike it would represent 48 stands of pike and I venture to say we would think that was a pike army (an conveniently average pikes are 24 points a file and superior knights are 23)...In both cases I would say we would expect teh pike or knights to play a major part in any game...hazelbark wrote: What defines "lots" of knights? 3 BGs of Knights plus 4 generals is half the points at 800. The real question with a lot of "knight" armies is what else do they have if the knights don't triumph.
The real difference is that the pikes are 6 battlegroups of pikes, so half the armies battlegroups are likely to be pike. In the knights case they are probably 25-30% of the battlegroups so it feels like less. But really they are the same frontage and probably equally important to the armies.
-
hazelbark
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
While I prefer in period this past weekend opponents didn't show so I took my Dacians against Castillians with 3 BGs of knights.davem wrote:
(DM) Yup. In DBM my NKE would gleefully set about Kn armies, in FOG they are victims awaiting their accident:-(
My experience is that FOG works best "in period" and Kn vs NKE etc. just doesn't work.
I was game because I wanted to see the interaction. All the terrain was around the edges center was clear. So I brought out the Dacians into the open at full throttle. The game ended I was likley to loose but had lost 11 out of 14 AP and the Castillians were 10 out of 14 lost.
I might have won had not some protected Castillian Crossbow hold my Falxman for about 4 rounds of melee until some Jinetes joined the fray.
But it was still a bloody mess for the Castillians and no cake walk.
-
madcam2us
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
- Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"
At first blush, and I too suffered from this, Kns and out of period fights appear tilted towards the medievals.
However, I recently took at Foederati army vs a tournament L. Hungarian list for 3 games and went 1/1/1.
The win happened in the final game and was over in 2.5 hours with a complete army break for the loss of 1 of my BGs.
Familiarity with the rules, armies, and opponents nets out the perceived advantages IMO.
Madcam
However, I recently took at Foederati army vs a tournament L. Hungarian list for 3 games and went 1/1/1.
The win happened in the final game and was over in 2.5 hours with a complete army break for the loss of 1 of my BGs.
Familiarity with the rules, armies, and opponents nets out the perceived advantages IMO.
Madcam
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3080
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
But that was partly because you ensured that two files of bow were just 4 inches from the end base of proper knights to shoot them up. Works in DBM, not FoG. That'l be bowmen, close fighters, then sea Peoples back in the boxdavem wrote:
(DM) Yup. In DBM my NKE would gleefully set about Kn armies, in FOG they are victims awaiting their accident:-(
My experience is that FOG works best "in period" and Kn vs NKE etc. just doesn't work.
But of course!! What self-respecting Pharoah ever fought "fair"? Rammettuphem can be accused of many things (mention goats and he'll sue) but playing "fair" certainly wasn't one of themgrahambriggs wrote:But that was partly because you ensured that two files of bow were just 4 inches from the end base of proper knights to shoot them up. Works in DBM, not FoG. That'l be bowmen, close fighters, then sea Peoples back in the boxdavem wrote:
(DM) Yup. In DBM my NKE would gleefully set about Kn armies, in FOG they are victims awaiting their accident:-(
My experience is that FOG works best "in period" and Kn vs NKE etc. just doesn't work.
Ahh, the memories of the 'clever' micro moves of DBM. Why did I ever think it was anything but incredibly gamey when I cunningly arranged to get 2 bow and a warwagon (dancing for the use of) shooting the same knight or even better 2 bow and an artillery.davem wrote:But of course!! What self-respecting Pharoah ever fought "fair"? Rammettuphem can be accused of many things (mention goats and he'll sue) but playing "fair" certainly wasn't one of themgrahambriggs wrote:But that was partly because you ensured that two files of bow were just 4 inches from the end base of proper knights to shoot them up. Works in DBM, not FoG. That'l be bowmen, close fighters, then sea Peoples back in the boxdavem wrote:
(DM) Yup. In DBM my NKE would gleefully set about Kn armies, in FOG they are victims awaiting their accident:-(
My experience is that FOG works best "in period" and Kn vs NKE etc. just doesn't work.
You don't win FoG games by clever micro moves. You need a good sense of timing, tactics and forward planning.



