Unit Issues 7.1.4

[terminator]

Not a bug, but I wonder why the British Special Service need resources to perform a sneak attack.
A knife doesn't cost that much

Other special actions cost the same price: put mines, blow up a bridge.

Thai Police :

There is a problem with the animations of Thai Police and Thai Heavy Police.

[Erik2]

Not a bug, but I wonder why the British Special Service need resources to perform a sneak attack.
A knife doesn't cost that much

Other special actions cost the same price: put mines, blow up a bridge.

Thai Police :

There is a problem with the animations of Thai Police and Thai Heavy Police.

Yes, but it takes far more resources to blow a bridge than wield a knife...

[LNDavoust]

You could argue that preparing the operation with antelation, bribing the local guards, getting the equipment to move in the terrain,... cost resources independiently that the weapon the commands uses.

[GabeKnight]

You could argue that preparing the operation with antelation, bribing the local guards, getting the equipment to move in the terrain,... cost resources independiently that the weapon the commands uses.

Agree. And those operations are always prepared perfectly, so that your troops never take damage in return...

[terminator]

Tunneling missing to certain German Infantry units :

- German Infantry '40
- German Infantry '41
- German Infantry '44

Animations :

- Volkssturm : panzerfaust not the best animation (http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtop ... 40#p758553)
- German Infantry '43 : Grenade or Panzerfaust ? (http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtop ... 40#p758640)

[GabeKnight]

Tunneling missing to certain German Infantry units :

I'm not saying that it shouldn't be added/fixed, but is there actually one scenario out there, stock or custom, utilizing that trait in some way?

[CoolDTA]

Never heard of that trait. I wonder if it is there because of the original Pacific campaigns but was never implemented.

[GabeKnight]

Never heard of that trait. I wonder if it is there because of the original Pacific campaigns but was never implemented.

It was implemented, and it works. Maybe the AI actually uses it (Okinawa, for example), but unseen by the player because of the FOW?

Screenshot 672.jpg (583.82 KiB) Viewed 3583 times

[CoolDTA]

Sorry, I meant implemented in the official content so that it is actually used. But thanks for the example - it is very good. There are tunnel entrances in several scenarios but I don't remember ever seeing any AI unit using them. Despite the FOW there are many times when player's units are close enough to see what is going on. I do remember thinking more than once why all these tunnels when they are never used.

[Halvralf]

StuG III B, D & E and Stuh 42 has the Anti-Tank trait but end up as tanks instead.

[Erik2]

Not a bug, but I wonder why the British Special Service need resources to perform a sneak attack.
A knife doesn't cost that much

Other special actions cost the same price: put mines, blow up a bridge.

Thai Police :

There is a problem with the animations of Thai Police and Thai Heavy Police.

Added to bug db

[Erik2]

Tunneling missing to certain German Infantry units :

- German Infantry '40
- German Infantry '41
- German Infantry '44

Animations :

- Volkssturm : panzerfaust not the best animation (http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtop ... 40#p758553)
- German Infantry '43 : Grenade or Panzerfaust ? (http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtop ... 40#p758640)

Added to bug db

[Erik2]

StuG III B, D & E and Stuh 42 has the Anti-Tank trait but end up as tanks instead.

Added to bug db

[terminator]

StuG III B, D & E and Stuh 42 has the Anti-Tank trait but end up as tanks instead.

Added to bug db

And you forget the Sturmpanzer IV and the Sturmtiger (Anti-Tank trait but Tanks). In contrast Wirbelwind and Ostwind are real Anti-Tanks

[GabeKnight]

Thai Police :

There is a problem with the animations of Thai Police and Thai Heavy Police.

What's the problem exactly?

[terminator]

Thai Police :

There is a problem with the animations of Thai Police and Thai Heavy Police.

What's the problem exactly?

Finally no problem (I had to edit the file effectSequences in error)

[terminator]

Something that I talked about during beta that hasn’t been corrected :

USHelmet(1).JPG (26.68 KiB) Viewed 3416 times

USHelmet(2).JPG (119.39 KiB) Viewed 3416 times

USHelmet(3).JPG (121.13 KiB) Viewed 3416 times

[terminator]

Not a real Bug, but an oversight perhaps ?

Captured units generally have the following characteristic : Limited Replacement.
Ex M4A2 Sherman :

Capture d’écran (9).jpg (82.41 KiB) Viewed 3386 times

Italian units serving in the German army do not have this characteristic :
- AB 43 (2259)
- Semovente M43 da 105/25 (2201)
- Carro Armato P26/40 (2260) :

Capture d’écran (9b).jpg (74.68 KiB) Viewed 3386 times

But I'm not sure whether that’s intentional or not

[bebro]

Italian units serving in the German army do not have this characteristic :
- AB 43 (2259)
- Semovente M43 da 105/25 (2201)
- Carro Armato P26/40 (2260) :

Those were not captured in the same sense as others. Certain Ita equipment was taken over into German service 1943.

(IIRC some stuff was even kept in production for that purpose).

[Erik2]

This CVE carrier is mistakenly listed as a CV carrier in the updates.
The name should also be spelled similar to the Kongō (and other vessels).

Taiyo.jpg (20.73 KiB) Viewed 3342 times

Added to bug db.