Empire of the Dragon

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:47 am

Is there a list of the armies contained in this book yet? There isn't one on the Field of Glory site. Has one been posted here that I have missed? Nik showed me something at Warfare but I got Charltoned so don't remember much.

flyingcrow · Post by **flyingcrow** » Sun Feb 01, 2009 8:15 pm

i dont think they have released that set of rules yet i heard that it would be released later on in the year

Spartacus · Post by **Spartacus** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:05 am

Phil mate.

I don`t think there has been a list posted yet as I have been looking for it too.

But there again I might have been "Charltoned" too.

When it comes out maybe you wanna come to Wales again for a chopstick duel?

Terry.

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:04 am

I definately know which army I'll be using when the book comes out. I was just after some advance warning of opponents. If the book is released late in the year it looks like my first use will be Usk. If it's in any of the Themes. Or is that Byzantium again?

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:12 am

philqw78 wrote:I definately know which army I'll be using when the book comes out. I was just after some advance warning of opponents. If the book is released late in the year it looks like my first use will be Usk. If it's in any of the Themes. Or is that Byzantium again?

Definitely not Byzantine again, but the choice for next year is fairly wide, so it isn't decided yet.

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:23 am

No Richard, is the THEME byzantine

No sense of humour in the NHS

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:40 am

philqw78 wrote:No Richard, is the THEME byzantine

No sense of humour in the NHS

Puns don't qualify as humour.

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:46 am

They're all I've got at this time on a Monday

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:10 am

philqw78 wrote:They're all I've got at this time on a Monday

Do you want ti bet?

timmy1 · Post by **timmy1** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:59 am

Dr RBS stated 'Puns don't qualify as humour.' In that case there is no hope for me as that is all I can do, humour wise.

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:10 am

Do you want ti bet?

Ne - pal of mine would stoop so low

hammy · Post by **hammy** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:13 pm

philqw78 wrote:
Do you want ti bet?
Ne - pal of mine would stoop so low

Has Richard inadvertently invented a new form of pun? The typo-pun

The first time I read this reply I assumed it was a plain typo but on subsequent reading and bearing in mind the army closest to Phil's heart I have been forced to reconsider.

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:24 pm

hammy wrote:
philqw78 wrote:
Do you want ti bet?
Ne - pal of mine would stoop so low
Has Richard inadvertently invented a new form of pun? The typo-pun

The first time I read this reply I assumed it was a plain typo but on subsequent reading and bearing in mind the army closest to Phil's heart I have been forced to reconsider.

It was, of course, deliberate.

hammy · Post by **hammy** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:31 pm

rbodleyscott wrote:
hammy wrote:
philqw78 wrote: Ne - pal of mine would stoop so low
Has Richard inadvertently invented a new form of pun? The typo-pun

The first time I read this reply I assumed it was a plain typo but on subsequent reading and bearing in mind the army closest to Phil's heart I have been forced to reconsider.
It was, of course, deliberate.

In which case I salute your invention