French dismounted knights

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
Rattleshirt
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: New Jersey

French dismounted knights

Post by Rattleshirt »

Hi there,

I'm looking to expand on my Medieval French. I've got the starter army at 600 points or thereabouts. I'm looking to add to it and want to add a BG of dismounted knights. It gives the option in Storm of Arrows to dismount knights as Superior, Heavy Foot, Heavily armored, undrilled, heavy weapon.

However, there's no actual line for them in the army list in Storm of Arrows... do I just use the points for the knights when mounted? If so, it's not a great value, in my opinion.

Anyway, any help? Do I construct the points myself using the main rulebook... something like 72 points for 6 bases, I think? Thanks!

Steve B
* Winter is coming. *
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: French dismounted knights

Post by david53 »

Rattleshirt wrote:Hi there,

I'm looking to expand on my Medieval French. I've got the starter army at 600 points or thereabouts. I'm looking to add to it and want to add a BG of dismounted knights. It gives the option in Storm of Arrows to dismount knights as Superior, Heavy Foot, Heavily armored, undrilled, heavy weapon.

However, there's no actual line for them in the army list in Storm of Arrows... do I just use the points for the knights when mounted? If so, it's not a great value, in my opinion.

Anyway, any help? Do I construct the points myself using the main rulebook... something like 72 points for 6 bases, I think? Thanks!

Steve B
You pay the points for them mounted and play them dismounted.
Dave
Rattleshirt
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: New Jersey

Post by Rattleshirt »

Dave, thanks for the quick reply.

I'm disappointed, however. I'm going to have to search elsewhere to give a little bite to my footmen. I've already got voulgiers which are very nice, and peasants which are the other end of the spectrum. And the crossbows are very average...

Ok, back to the army list...

Steve B
* Winter is coming. *
daleivan
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 373
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Post by daleivan »

FWIW you basically just decide to deploy a knight battle group as dismounting during set-up. I see it more as a way of deciding to use the knights on foot at the last minute; certainly you could decide well advance to do that. You're certainly right that they are expensive to buy as knights but use as dismounted but the nice thing is that you have a choice, and heavily armored heavy weapon superior foot are nothing to sneeze at in my book :)

Cheers,

Dale
Rattleshirt
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: New Jersey

Post by Rattleshirt »

Dale, I agree completely. It would be a powerful unit. I'm just trying to expand my current army on a budget. If I'm going to buy a BG of knights on foot, I'm going to use them in my army and that's it. That, and I already have 3 full BG of knights already... so, I'm wondering if that's too many points on the BG when I can use them towards something else.

Then again, I also play friendly games only (no tournies) so if I were over 800 points, it probably wouldn't be a big deal... hmmm...
* Winter is coming. *
Redpossum
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1814
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:09 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:

Post by Redpossum »

daleivan wrote: heavily armored heavy weapon superior foot
OMG yes!
Andy1972
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 338
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:46 am
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

Post by Andy1972 »

Never have played the French.. But i usually never take more than 2 BG's of 4 HA,sup,UD, lance, sword.. They eat up alot of points and once they are commited they are hard to get back in line.. In 15mm i like for my armies to have 12 BG.
Po-tae-toes! Mash 'em up and put 'em in a stew!
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

I have seen a French army with 24 bases of knights. Granted it was in a 900 point comp but it looked rather intimidating.

From memory it either won big or lost big, no in the middle stuff.
Rattleshirt
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: New Jersey

Post by Rattleshirt »

Yeah, I think possum's reaction is along with mine. I'm going for it.

A bit of history here, I play mostly against a HYW English (continental) opponent. We each began with the starter armies in the book and are now ready to upgrade. Well, his army is pretty much foot men, often waiting for me to attack, so he's increasing his mobility with mostly mounted units... some knights, some cavalry, some light horse. I forget the exact details of the HYW English list. And more offensive options, offensive spear allies or some such.

Anyhow, since we're in a bit of an arms race, my philosophy has always been that the strength of the French list is it's knights... so a third mounted BG (I mispoke earlier, I only have two full at the moment) and one on foot to help bolster the foot men... the weakness of the French list. Lots of MF, mostly crossbows which aren't too great unless massed at one target. The voulgiers hold up nicely and I'd like another unit like them. Believe it or not, I also enjoy my 2 points per base peasant levy... they're a great unignorable speed bump that he needs to negotiate whether he likes it or not. I'm also debating the French archers... I'm very envious of the longbow POA, even if they are rated poor.

I started playing the French with knight BG of only 4 bases but they were too vulnerable, especially as they were nearing the longbows. Six bases per BG is much more durable. Perhaps less maneuverable, but I've managed my way around that.... I'd rather hit with a full strength BG than with one that's been disrupted by longbows.

In any case, thanks for the thoughts gents. This thread is really making me analyze what I've got and what I need/want!

Steve B
* Winter is coming. *
Redpossum
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1814
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:09 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:

Post by Redpossum »

I mean, really!

How many lists in FoG ofer the possibility of HA, Superior foot at all? The HW part is just gravy. Do I understand correctly that HW negates the Skilled Swordsman POA? Could these be legion killers?

If these guys were Drilled, they'd be demi-gods.

"You are Frenchmen. I am your king. There is the enemy. Charge!"

Of course, the guy who said that got his ass handed to him...but his knights attacked mounted.
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

possum wrote: How many lists in FoG ofer the possibility of HA, Superior foot at all?


Not a lot, but they also include some of the Varangians in the Byzantine world, but otherwise dismounted knights. Some lists have them available without horses too!
Do I understand correctly that HW negates the Skilled Swordsman POA? Could these be legion killers?
Well Legion killers maybe not but tough dudes for the legion absolutely.

Dismounted Knights
Heavy Armor +
vs
Legion
S Sword +

The skilled sword negated the heavy weapon. You have it backwards. But ordinary legions with just swordsmen have a problem
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

possum wrote:
Do I understand correctly that HW negates the Skilled Swordsman POA?

Other way around :twisted:
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
GrumblingGrognard
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by GrumblingGrognard »

Rattleshirt wrote:I play mostly against a HYW English (continental) opponent....we're in a bit of an arms race...I'm very envious of the longbow POA, even if they are rated poor....

Steve B
Have you looked at the possiblity of a Scottish ally?

GG
The Grumbling Grognard
Rattleshirt
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: New Jersey

Post by Rattleshirt »

I have looked at it a bit... but, to get alot of bows, I'd need to pay for a Scottish commander. And I could get HF that are heavily armored, but not the superior rating... but then I couldn't get that third BG of knights... and that's one thing I definitely want. I'm not willing to give up the mobility and the "fear factor" that the knights provide in my opponent. You'd think he was actually on the field facing them as they come in...

Good thoughts though, GG... The Scots would be my choice if I didn't want more knights also...
* Winter is coming. *
Rattleshirt
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: New Jersey

Post by Rattleshirt »

GrumblingGrognard,

I take it back... I CAN have my third BG of knights as well as taking a decent BG of MAA and decent archers... much better than the French "speedbump" archers. We've decided to up our 600 point armies to 900 points... so that gives me the room to take what I want. Of course he's doing the same, but I think it's time the Scots took the field in support of the French! 8)

Steve B
* Winter is coming. *
GrumblingGrognard
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by GrumblingGrognard »

Rattleshirt wrote:GrumblingGrognard,

...I think it's time the Scots took the field in support of the French! 8)

Steve B

Well, win or lose with the Scotish there it will at least piss off the English. :twisted:

GG
The Grumbling Grognard
Redpossum
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1814
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:09 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:

Post by Redpossum »

GrumblingGrognard wrote:
Rattleshirt wrote:GrumblingGrognard,

...I think it's time the Scots took the field in support of the French! 8)

Steve B

Well, win or lose with the Scotish there it will at least piss off the English. :twisted:
Always a laudable goal in and of itself :) :) :)
ColeF
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 3:09 pm
Location: Sunny South

Post by ColeF »

nikgaukroger wrote:
possum wrote:
Do I understand correctly that HW negates the Skilled Swordsman POA?

Other way around :twisted:
Yesss!!! 8) The roman legions beat EVERYTHING! (except the mongols :roll: )
Computers are fast, accurate and stupid. Humans are incredibly slow inaccurate and brilliant. Albert Einstein
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”