Can someone confirm what are the benefits of closed vs open order Warbands?
I think obviously closed should have better cohesion, be better in hand to hand combat and open order should be less vulnerable to ranged
is there something else? would open order be better in rough terrain?
Open vs closed order Warband
Re: Open vs closed order Warband
Open don’t get disorderd in rough terrain
Re: Open vs closed order Warband
Also watch the fine print. Loose vs close may seem like an even fight, but the loose warbands get a penalty in open ground every time they lose in combat. This makes them a bit more likely to get disrupted and also more likely to get a double drop. It's the same risk you take using medium infantry in open terrain.
Re: Open vs closed order Warband
loose = rough ground and forests
close = open terrain
also they are very good against any other medium infantry, especially in impact phase
close = open terrain
also they are very good against any other medium infantry, especially in impact phase
Re: Open vs closed order Warband
So just to be clear, there is no difference in terms of ranged attack negative? both loose and close will get the same damage by ranged attack?
Re: Open vs closed order Warband
The armour is the same, so I expect so.
Actually, this raises a question of my own. Does 'undrilled heavy foot' mean anything other than the unit is a heavy infantry unit that is unmanoeuvrable?
Actually, this raises a question of my own. Does 'undrilled heavy foot' mean anything other than the unit is a heavy infantry unit that is unmanoeuvrable?
Re: Open vs closed order Warband
I think "undrilled" also means they don't get the +1 cohesion check modifier like regular heavy foot do (IIRC from the discussion around rebalancing warbands ages ago). So they're less resilient than heavy foot, but not quite as frail as medium foot (who get an additional -1 penalty against horse or heavy foot in open terrain).
Kabill's Great Generals Mod for FoG2: http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=492&t=84915
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Open vs closed order Warband
No.Ludendorf wrote:The armour is the same, so I expect so.
Actually, this raises a question of my own. Does 'undrilled heavy foot' mean anything other than the unit is a heavy infantry unit that is unmanoeuvrable?
However, "Warbands (Close Order)" and "Superior Warbands (Close order)" don't get the +1 Cohesion Test bonus that other Heavy Foot do. They also differ from other Heavy Foot by pursuing defeated infantry foes.
This still leaves "Warbands (Loose Order)" weaker, because they get an addition -1 Cohesion Test modifier if they lose a close combat vs Heavy Foot or Mounted Troops in Open Terrain.
So the trade off is that the loose order ones are better in Rough or Difficult terrain (because they are not as disordered), but worse in the open (because of the -1 CT modifier).
Ideally you want a mix of both, so you can put Close Order ones in the Open and Loose Order ones in the terrain.
Richard Bodley Scott






