Are escorts even worth it?
Moderators: Order of Battle Moderators, The Artistocrats
Are escorts even worth it?
I really like this game – but this sort of thing drives me nuts
Scenario: Winter War – Lapland (level 3)
Fokker (1 star – strength 10) C.X protected by:
BF 109 w/ Juutilainen (5 stars – 10 SP)
BF109 w/ Puhakka (5 stars – 10 SP)
BF109 (1+ star – 10SP)
The Fokker is attacked by a single German BF109 (no stars)
My 3xBF109 only cause 2 casualty points on the German
The German causes 4 casualty points on my Fokker
To steal a phrase from a former co-worker:
Boss, that ain’t right!
Edit: corrected name I had wrong.
Scenario: Winter War – Lapland (level 3)
Fokker (1 star – strength 10) C.X protected by:
BF 109 w/ Juutilainen (5 stars – 10 SP)
BF109 w/ Puhakka (5 stars – 10 SP)
BF109 (1+ star – 10SP)
The Fokker is attacked by a single German BF109 (no stars)
My 3xBF109 only cause 2 casualty points on the German
The German causes 4 casualty points on my Fokker
To steal a phrase from a former co-worker:
Boss, that ain’t right!
Edit: corrected name I had wrong.
Last edited by Korvessa on Sat May 19, 2018 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Are escorts even worth it?
True, the escort mechanics are not the best ones. They don't protect the bomber as they imo should, but at least you get some free shots with your fighters. Though in your case surprisingly ineffective ones. 
-
Navman2854
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA

- Posts: 231
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:09 pm
- Location: Wilmington DE USA
Re: Are escorts even worth it?
Yeah, escorted bombers seem to take losses they shouldn't when capable escorts are there. That being said, I ALWAYS escort bombers when I can at a 1:1 ratio at minimum. For me, definitely worth it.
Re: Are escorts even worth it?
I just conducted an experiment - with escorts. Here are the results:
Everything is at full strength, the number in parins is the experience level
1st number is Finnish loss, 2nd is German
None 5 0
1 x Moraine Saulter (1) 5 0
1 x Myrsky (1) 5 1
1 x Generic BF109 (1) 5 1
1 x BF109 (5) w/ Juutilainen (+3 defense) 4 1
1 x BF109 (5) w/ Puhakka (+2 att/ +2Def, but no range) 5 1
Moraine Saulnier & Myrsky 5 1
2 x Generic BF109 (5) 6 2
2 x BF109 (5) w/ Juutilainen & Puhakka 4 2
3 x BF109 (5) w/ Juutilainen & Puhakka 4 1
3 x BF 109 (5, 5, 1) 5 1
4 x BF109 (5,5,1,1) 5 1
Edited: Corrected name
Everything is at full strength, the number in parins is the experience level
1st number is Finnish loss, 2nd is German
None 5 0
1 x Moraine Saulter (1) 5 0
1 x Myrsky (1) 5 1
1 x Generic BF109 (1) 5 1
1 x BF109 (5) w/ Juutilainen (+3 defense) 4 1
1 x BF109 (5) w/ Puhakka (+2 att/ +2Def, but no range) 5 1
Moraine Saulnier & Myrsky 5 1
2 x Generic BF109 (5) 6 2
2 x BF109 (5) w/ Juutilainen & Puhakka 4 2
3 x BF109 (5) w/ Juutilainen & Puhakka 4 1
3 x BF 109 (5, 5, 1) 5 1
4 x BF109 (5,5,1,1) 5 1
Edited: Corrected name
Last edited by Korvessa on Sat May 19, 2018 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Are escorts even worth it?
I'm not surprised there's little (or not at all) help for the bomber (having witnessed the same), but I am disappointed the enemy losses are so low. The whole mechanics obviously needs fixing.
Krmh, it is actually (Ilmari) Juutilainen, not Ilmarinen. Olli Puhakka had 42 confirmed kills, but Hasse Wind had 75 and was awarded Mannerheim cross twice. Wonder why he was not chosen to be the other FAF ace.
Krmh, it is actually (Ilmari) Juutilainen, not Ilmarinen. Olli Puhakka had 42 confirmed kills, but Hasse Wind had 75 and was awarded Mannerheim cross twice. Wonder why he was not chosen to be the other FAF ace.
-
hrafnkolbrandr
- Senior Corporal - Destroyer

- Posts: 118
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:26 pm
Re: Are escorts even worth it?
My unscientific experience has shown that there is little to no benefit to giving ground attackers more than a single escort.
That said, escorting cheap attack aircraft with your expensive fighters is the best way to take out the enemy fighter force with minimal losses. Your ground attackers get chewed up, but your fighters stay effective for much longer. They can then take out the weakened fighters, and still knock out enemy ground attackers before needing to land and repair (saving you on repairs to ground units as well).
That said, escorting cheap attack aircraft with your expensive fighters is the best way to take out the enemy fighter force with minimal losses. Your ground attackers get chewed up, but your fighters stay effective for much longer. They can then take out the weakened fighters, and still knock out enemy ground attackers before needing to land and repair (saving you on repairs to ground units as well).
Re: Are escorts even worth it?
Its another story when you escort high altitude bomber. But true, the escort isnt good enough if your fighters can attack other plane
Re: Are escorts even worth it?
You are absolutely right - and I know better - it is of course Juutilainen - for some unknown reason when I renamed the counter I got it wrong.CoolDTA wrote:I'm not surprised there's little (or not at all) help for the bomber (having witnessed the same), but I am disappointed the enemy losses are so low. The whole mechanics obviously needs fixing.
Krmh, it is actually (Ilmari) Juutilainen, not Ilmarinen. Olli Puhakka had 42 confirmed kills, but Hasse Wind had 75 and was awarded Mannerheim cross twice. Wonder why he was not chosen to be the other FAF ace.
The Osprey book on Finnish Air Force says Puhakka was considered the most skilled pilot - though not (obviously) the highest scorer.\
Perhaps that is why his stats don't have a range like Juutilainen's do?
Re: Are escorts even worth it?
I don't use fighter escorts most of the time. I think better strategy is not to deploy your bombers until the skies are safe. With no bombers to attack, the AI likes to attack my fighters instead even with inferior planes. This makes the sky cleanup much faster and my bombers do not take any damage in the process.
Author and maintainer of Unit Navigator Tool for Order Of Battle (http://mfendek.byethost16.com/)
-
stan23
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA

- Posts: 201
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 11:35 pm
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Are escorts even worth it?
Hmmm. Never thought of that. Sounds like a real good strategy.
-
GabeKnight
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040

- Posts: 3710
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: Are escorts even worth it?
Yeah, I use recon planes for that. They get shot down quite often, but thus save my bombers and fighters.Mojko wrote:I don't use fighter escorts most of the time. I think better strategy is not to deploy your bombers until the skies are safe. With no bombers to attack, the AI likes to attack my fighters instead even with inferior planes. This makes the sky cleanup much faster and my bombers do not take any damage in the process.
They're an AI dogfighter magnet like engineers are an AI artillery magnet...
I think the support mechanic (AT also) does somehow stack with the attack values of the unit that's being attacked. The weaker the attacked unit's (counter)attack stats, the less the supporting unit does damage. Sorry, my English sucks sometimes.


