Question on Pursuer Impact

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
SirGarnet
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2186
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:13 am

Question on Pursuer Impact

Post by SirGarnet »

We had a Knight BG roll up in pursuit in their turn, which was blocked from catching the routers because the move tagged the very end of a third BG, who had set up for a flank charge on the Knights before the Knights' opponents broke. Although the third BG was essentially on the flank, since the pursuers contacted them on that end base I want to confirm that the Impact is treated as frontal in Impact so in the following melee phase the contacted BG has to swing about 90 degrees to in front of the Knights, other units in the way permitting.

Is that right?

Code: Select all

Contacted BG bases = CC
Knight Pursuers = KK
Arrrow indicates pursuit stopped when K contacts tip of C.


C
 C
 CC                                 
  CC                            CONFORMS in pre-melee MOVEMENT AS?
   CC     KK
    CC  KKKKKK                        
      C   |                               KK
       C  V                             KKKKKKK
                                  CCCCCCCC
       ROUTERS

Had the contacted BG charged it would have been a flank charge. Bad luck the routers broke too soon. .

Thanks

Mike
berthier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Contact:

Post by berthier »

Knights would conform to the charged unit not the target to the charger. At least that is my understanding of the Conforming rules on page 70.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Conforming is done by the "active" BG - i.e. belonging to the player whose turn it is.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
lawrenceg
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Former British Empire

Post by lawrenceg »

looks right to me.

Did you remember that you cannot do a flank charge if any part of your BG is in front of the target BG?

From your diagram it looks as though CC would not have had a flank charge, but this might be due to the imprecise nature of ASCII art. If it was a potential flank charge then the knghts must have wheeled towardsCC during their pursuit.
Lawrence Greaves
frederic
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 628
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:29 am

Post by frederic »

lawrenceg wrote:If it was a potential flank charge then the knghts must have wheeled towardsCC during their pursuit.
I was thinking a pursuit should be straight ahead !
jre
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 252
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:17 pm
Location: Zaragoza, Spain

Post by jre »

If the pursued shift/contract/turn to avoid terrain and are no longer to the front of the pursuers, the pursuers can wheel to keep chasing them.

José
lawrenceg
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Former British Empire

Post by lawrenceg »

frederic wrote:
lawrenceg wrote:If it was a potential flank charge then the knghts must have wheeled towardsCC during their pursuit.
I was thinking a pursuit should be straight ahead !
To clarify:

If CC had a potential flank charge on KK, then a straight-ahead pursuit by KK could not have contacted CC.

They could only contact CC if they wheeled during the pursuit. This could only happen if they were following routers who routed at a strange angle for some reason, e.g. jre's comment.
Lawrence Greaves
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”