value of superiors?

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
benos
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:01 pm

value of superiors?

Post by benos »

hello,
I am currently building my first army specifically for fog, the foderate romans, after 3 years away from 15 mm after ditching dbm. I have noticed that only 1/3 of non foderatti may be superior. Which troops would you advise to take as superior?
Many thanks
Ben
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

The ones you plan to do most fighting with - which will depend on your army composition and, probably, your style of play.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
SirGarnet
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2186
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:13 am

Post by SirGarnet »

What Nik said about the ones who will fight. To avoid letting the restriction unduly affect your recruiting, I suggest starting with a list disregarding the limitation in order to get the army structure you want first, then start paring back Superiors if desirable.

I expect you'll be fighting with the Auxilia. With my approach at least one Superior 9-base BG is handy to have, though it requires another Superior battle BG for rear support.

If I had Cataphracts, I'd want them Superior. I also have a soft spot for Superior Huns. It really does depend, though, on how you want to tweak the final list to fit within the target points.
madcam2us
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"

Post by madcam2us »

The great 1/3 debate...

IMO don't get the MF Aux as superior. They can't be upgraded with armor and being MF will suffer doubly if needing to fight out of terrain. Keep these avg at best.

The HF legions are a possibility but since you need to get so many other BGs at a minimum, they are an expensive luxury IMO.

I've played the Foederati 15-18 games (all friendlies) and feel the army is best with 1-2 BGs of the Foederati mounted lancers, minimum MF and the rest support.

To that end, I always take the upgraded Cv to armored Horse archers as superior. I can have 12 bases so start with the assumption of needing 6 non-allied, non Foederati/Isuarians BGs in order to max them out at 3 BGs.

Take the Sagittarrii and the Jv/lt spr LH for two BGs
Take the Slingers for another
Take the MF for a 4th

Depending on size of the above (you'll be limited with the LH to two BGs of 4 since you are limited to 20 stands of Roman horse and you already have upgraded the armored horse archers with 12) all you need now are 2 more BGs of average troop types.

What is your fighting style?
Do you want to move first or do you want to dictate terrain?
I like an Inspired commander + two Troop commaders and thats 150 points.

My latest list is something like:

6xCv lancers sup, undrilled
6xCv lancers sup, undrilled
4xCV armor sup, bow/swd drilled
4xCv armor sup, bow/swd drilled
4xCv armor sup, bow/swd drilled
4xLH bow poor drilled
4xLH jav/lt spr poor drilled
6xMF pro, avg, drilled lt spr/swd
4xMF unp, drilled, bow
4xlh unp, undrilled bow/swd
4xLF unp, poor drilled sling
IC
2xTC

Its an army I love, but suffers out of period.

Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
benos
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:01 pm

Post by benos »

many thanks, much to ponder here. It seems the cavalry are the troops to win with and the infantry support them?
I hadn't planned on using the archer cav but may think again.
Cheers
Ben
madcam2us
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"

Post by madcam2us »

By the foederati time the roman army was emulating their foes and these with the horse type armies... ie Hunnish/gothic..

The foot was secondary and made up of native (foederati) that retained many of their native fighting styles. If you want a foot army go with Dominate as they get their MF as armored.

There is tons of posts as to the Dominate steamroller with 19 BGs with 9 BGs of 4xMF armored lt spr/swd.

Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
KingHassan
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:40 pm

Post by KingHassan »

Madcam, how can that latest list have that much superior cav?
It is also one of my favorite armies and I look forward to playing it more often.
madcam2us
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"

Post by madcam2us »

Because the Foederate (undrilled lance/swd) don't count for the min/max...

remember, the restrictions are in place for all troops except foederati, isurians and allies....

Foederati are the HF impact/swds & the Cv lance/swd....

Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
benos
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:01 pm

Post by benos »

ok having tried to take in the above the draft list would be:
1 fc
2 tc
3 bgs of 4 cav ptd sup und lnc swd
2 bgs of 6 mf ptd ave dld ls swd
1 bg of 4 lh unp ave dld bow
1 bg of 4 lh unp ave dld ls j
1 bg of 4 lh unp ave und bow swd
1 bg of 4 lf unp pr dld sling
1 bg of 6 cav arm sup dld ls swd
1 bg of 4 ct harm sup dld lnc swd.
To 650 pts
Does this look ok? Are the superiors in the right place?
Cheers ben
KingHassan
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:40 pm

Post by KingHassan »

I didn't notice that exception.
Nice list design.

I will try it out and report.


JM
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”