LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft
-
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:31 pm
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Challenge up for enakan
password 280BC
password 280BC
-
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:31 pm
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Two Pyrrhus against Rome results:
Edmund (Pyrrhus) 24/45 vs Enakan (Romans) 64/58
Edmund 11.0
Enakan 5.3
Edmund (Romans) 51/58 vs Iandavidsmith (Pyrrhus) 49/45
Edmund 10.9
Iandavidsmith 8.8
Thanks for two close (and rather violent) games
Edmund (Pyrrhus) 24/45 vs Enakan (Romans) 64/58
Edmund 11.0
Enakan 5.3
Edmund (Romans) 51/58 vs Iandavidsmith (Pyrrhus) 49/45
Edmund 10.9
Iandavidsmith 8.8
Thanks for two close (and rather violent) games
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
TDefender (Romans) 64/58 vs Londo (Pyrrhus) 19/45
Londo: 11 pts / TDefender 4,2 pts.
Fogman (Romans) 44/58 vs TDefender 52/45 (Pyrrhus)
Fogman: 11,5 / TDefender 7,5 pts.
Ok the "worse player" prize is awarded
Londo: 11 pts / TDefender 4,2 pts.
Fogman (Romans) 44/58 vs TDefender 52/45 (Pyrrhus)
Fogman: 11,5 / TDefender 7,5 pts.
Ok the "worse player" prize is awarded

-
- Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:56 am
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Hey that's my spotTDefender wrote:TDefender (Romans) 64/58 vs Londo (Pyrrhus) 19/45
Londo: 11 pts / TDefender 4,2 pts.
Fogman (Romans) 44/58 vs TDefender 52/45 (Pyrrhus)
Fogman: 11,5 / TDefender 7,5 pts.
Ok the "worse player" prize is awarded

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Think I forgot to post a result!
Ian and I had a hard fight, his Romans vs my Pyrrhics.
Enakan 10.0
Ian 8.7
Good game!!!!!
Now where did I put my keys.................
Ian and I had a hard fight, his Romans vs my Pyrrhics.
Enakan 10.0
Ian 8.7
Good game!!!!!
Now where did I put my keys.................
NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER SURRENDER!!!!!!!
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Fifth Round: no maneuver bs for this one, just pure close combat mayhem.
Romans vs Samnites & Gauls
Make sure you play with version 2 (above)
TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans)
Enakan (Samnites) vs TDefender (Romans)
Fogman (Samnites) vs Enakan (Romans)
Iandavidsmith (Samnites) vs Fogman (Romans)
Londo (Samnites) vs Iandavidsmith (Romans)
Edmund (Samnites) vs Londo (Romans)
The Samnite Player initiates the challenge.
Note: Enakan can’t initiate so TDefender you need to initiate in your matchup.
Historical Deployment
No Double Move, No Fog of War.
Use password.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Roman and Latin Hastatii are swordsmen +, not just swordsmen. Same with elite Samnites and Noble Gauls. For some reason, the description panel shows them as swordsmen, at least on Mac. They are swordsmen + for combat purposes.
Enjoy
Romans vs Samnites & Gauls
Make sure you play with version 2 (above)
TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans)
Enakan (Samnites) vs TDefender (Romans)
Fogman (Samnites) vs Enakan (Romans)
Iandavidsmith (Samnites) vs Fogman (Romans)
Londo (Samnites) vs Iandavidsmith (Romans)
Edmund (Samnites) vs Londo (Romans)
The Samnite Player initiates the challenge.
Note: Enakan can’t initiate so TDefender you need to initiate in your matchup.
Historical Deployment
No Double Move, No Fog of War.
Use password.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Roman and Latin Hastatii are swordsmen +, not just swordsmen. Same with elite Samnites and Noble Gauls. For some reason, the description panel shows them as swordsmen, at least on Mac. They are swordsmen + for combat purposes.
Enjoy
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Previously,
Tarentans vs Lucanians
Edmund (Tarentans) 10
Fogman (Lucanians) 9.3
Edmund (Lucanians) 9.0
Fogman (Tarentans) 4.4
Tarentans vs Lucanians
Edmund (Tarentans) 10
Fogman (Lucanians) 9.3
Edmund (Lucanians) 9.0
Fogman (Tarentans) 4.4
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Games up:
TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans) pw: veni
Enakan (Samnites) vs TDefender (Romans) pw: vidi
TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans) pw: veni
Enakan (Samnites) vs TDefender (Romans) pw: vidi
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Thank you T!!!!
Heading over to accept!

Fogman, ready when you are!
Heading over to accept!



Fogman, ready when you are!
NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER SURRENDER!!!!!!!
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Challenge up for Ian ...
pw mayhem
pw mayhem
-
- Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:56 am
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Att Fogman ,
Challenge posted
Password = foggy
Good luck
Ian
Challenge posted
Password = foggy
Good luck
Ian
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Challenge for Enakan
Fogman (Samnites) vs Enakan (Romans)
pw: italia
Fogman (Samnites) vs Enakan (Romans)
pw: italia
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Thank you Fogman!
Results for TDefender and I, good close game, especially at the end!
T's Romans 8.8 against my Samnites 10.0, started out early ahead but he was narrowing the lead towards the end of the game.
Thanks Tee!!!!!!!

Results for TDefender and I, good close game, especially at the end!
T's Romans 8.8 against my Samnites 10.0, started out early ahead but he was narrowing the lead towards the end of the game.
Thanks Tee!!!!!!!

NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER SURRENDER!!!!!!!
-
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:31 pm
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Challenge up for Londo. Password 280BC.
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Another defeat
TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans) 56/61 - 28/48
TDefender: 5,2 pts
Edmund: 9,2 pts
Thanks everyone for the battles!

TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans) 56/61 - 28/48
TDefender: 5,2 pts
Edmund: 9,2 pts
Thanks everyone for the battles!
-
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:31 pm
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Thanks for posting TDefender, you beat me to it. Thanks also for a good battle where you killed most of my generals! It was actually 61/56 though, so I think I get 10.9. Not that it makes much difference as Londo has just beaten me in the other game. I suspect he has won comfortably overall.TDefender wrote:Another defeat![]()
TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans) 56/61 - 28/48
TDefender: 5,2 pts
Edmund: 9,2 pts
Thanks everyone for the battles!
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Sorry you're right! it's 56/51 - 28/48 so yes you get 10.9 points! 

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Fogman knocked me off a couple of days ago, his Samnites vs my Romans.
But I'll let HIM tell you the gory details!!!

But I'll let HIM tell you the gory details!!!



NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER SURRENDER!!!!!!!
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Londo (Romans) 32/48 - Edmund (Gauls and Samnites) 51/51
Londo 10
Edmund 6.7
The Romans were not keen on fighting Gauls in broken or forested terrain, so staged a mock retreat away from them, which had the desired effect. The Gauls came out to play, but were soon suffering from lack of armour (and good Roman dice).
The battle with the Samnites was a more even affair.
The Triarii were pillars of strength - they defeated everything in front of them, and not one of the four units was even disrupted by the end.
Londo 10
Edmund 6.7
The Romans were not keen on fighting Gauls in broken or forested terrain, so staged a mock retreat away from them, which had the desired effect. The Gauls came out to play, but were soon suffering from lack of armour (and good Roman dice).
The battle with the Samnites was a more even affair.
The Triarii were pillars of strength - they defeated everything in front of them, and not one of the four units was even disrupted by the end.
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
A couple of results,
Romans (fogman) 42/51 vs Samnites (Enakan) 50/48
fogman 10.4
Enakan 8.2
Epirotes (fogman) 36/45 vs Romans (Londo) 61/58
fogman 10.5
Londo 8.0
Only two battles in progress. We’re moving into Lords of History next for those interested.
Romans (fogman) 42/51 vs Samnites (Enakan) 50/48
fogman 10.4
Enakan 8.2
Epirotes (fogman) 36/45 vs Romans (Londo) 61/58
fogman 10.5
Londo 8.0
Only two battles in progress. We’re moving into Lords of History next for those interested.