Picked PzC back up after a break and went into a campaign. Vanilla, no mods or DLC yet. Always takes me back to my old PG games and it is an enjoyable experience. I want the grand campaign, but will wait for it to go on sale.
On the "green" campaign path and sitting at the Moscow deployment screen. It's the same army I always have somehow. Not sure if it is force of habit in the game or general OOB bias for balanced force. Thought that sharing here and seeking opinions may open up a few new ways of looking at my force structure, without going to gamey extremes just for variation.
I treat ground units as regiments and planes as squadrons. Two main columns(sometimes three), with specialist units as needed. All three SE units are tanks... 2x PzIIIJ and a PzIVF.
Here is the Moscow '41 deployment...
1st Division..
1x Inf
1x Pioneer
1x Gren
2x PzIIIJ
1x PzIVF
1x 17 cm art
1x 21 cm art
1x Wurf art
1x 8Rad recon
I have this twice, except the tank types are switched. Plus 1x Fallschirm, 1x Bridging and 1x 7/1 SP AAA.
In the air I have...
5x 109e (already looking ahead to USA.. want exp)
2x StukaB
1x Bf110F
1x Ju88
-----
This easily splits into three columns as needed. But... it's the same darn army I end up with every time. I mean since PG1 I have done similar. I follow a logical progression of capabilities and needs.
I amost always add one or two more Fallshirm next to balance out capabilities. I can feel it coming, so thought that the first step is admitting I have a problem.
My name's Carl, and I am an OOB addict.
Any suggestions?





