Typo in Alexander's List

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
ScottS
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:49 pm

Typo in Alexander's List

Post by ScottS »

In the Alexandrian Macedonian list, there are entries for Greek Mercenary Hoplites.

Traditional Hoplites: 0-8
Iphikratean Hoplites: 0-8

But the group total is 0-36.

I'm guessing that should be 0-16...?


Don't get me wrong, I love my little Xyston Hoplites, but 36 seems to be a bit much...
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Not in my copy.

The BG size for the trad hoplites and the Iphikrateans are both 6-8 (which I think you may be misreading) but the total bases allowed of the two types combined is correctly 0-36.

Alternatively one of us has an odd copy ...
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

In my copy of Immortal fire the numbers are:

Traditional hoplites BG size 6-8
Iphikratean hoplites BG size 6-8
Total number of bases of either type 0-36

You could have 6 BGs of 6 Iphikrateans if you want.
ScottS
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:49 pm

Post by ScottS »

nikgaukroger wrote:Not in my copy.

The BG size for the trad hoplites and the Iphikrateans are both 6-8 (which I think you may be misreading)
Ah, you're right. Sorry, my mistake!

D'oh!


Edit: While we're at it, how would you recommend deploying the Pezhetaroi/Foot Companions?

Blocks of 12 - frontage of 3, depth of 4?
ScottS
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:49 pm

Post by ScottS »

Was that a bad question...?
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28284
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

ScottS wrote:Was that a bad question...?
The matter has been debated at length in various threads. The upshot is that some people prefer 8s and some prefer 12s. There is no clear cut better size. Both should be deployed 4 ranks deep. A few people prefer 10s and deploy them 5 ranks deep to allow for base losses, but this does sacrifice deployment width - already an issue with pikes deployed 4 deep.
ScottS
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:49 pm

Post by ScottS »

Ah, that makes sense. I was wondering if there was some sort of consensus on the matter.

I'll try both methods, and see how it works out.

Thanks for the reply!
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”