Hi all.
Last night we had this situation:
.........BB
AAAA BB
.........CKK
.........CKK
.........C
.........C
A and B are HF romans BG, C and K are Cav macedonians BG that charge B in the impact phase.
Between A and B there's less than one base width (about 1 MU) and they are aligned orizontally.
In the move phase, BG C could expand on the left, as follow:
.........BB
AAAA BB
.......CCKK
.......CCKK
doing so, C contact BG A, but not as front corner to front corner, cause the distance between A and B (about 1MU).
What's happen?
A conforms to C and combat in the melee phase?
A doesn't conform to C and combat too?
C doesn't expand because his contact on A isn't legal?
Thank you
Diego
Feeding bases in melee
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
As far as I can see there is nothing to stop the expansion. If A were an overlap it would be fine and as A is lined up exactly with B the expansion would be much the same as if A was an overlap.
There is no such thing as a 'legal' contact in FoG, if you contact something you contact it and that is all.
IMO in this situation C can expand which will pull A into the melee, A could respond buy moving one base (one file) to the rear to give another dice in the melee. In the next Roman movement phase A would have to conform to C assuming C was still there i.e. had not been forced to break off.
There is no such thing as a 'legal' contact in FoG, if you contact something you contact it and that is all.
IMO in this situation C can expand which will pull A into the melee, A could respond buy moving one base (one file) to the rear to give another dice in the melee. In the next Roman movement phase A would have to conform to C assuming C was still there i.e. had not been forced to break off.
My ruling would be:
'C' expands to contact 'A'
Neither BG conforms - 'C' can't because it's in contact with 'B' while 'A' can only conform in his own move.
'A' may contract by one file to place a second rank base to fight 'C'
'C' fights 'A' as if they were lined up. (i.e. with an overlap to its left)
In the following move 'A' must conform to 'C'
'C' expands to contact 'A'
Neither BG conforms - 'C' can't because it's in contact with 'B' while 'A' can only conform in his own move.
'A' may contract by one file to place a second rank base to fight 'C'
'C' fights 'A' as if they were lined up. (i.e. with an overlap to its left)
In the following move 'A' must conform to 'C'
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8840
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Zombie thread
IMO both Hammy and Terry were wrong. But it was 3 years ago.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3080
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am





