3.10 Game

[Cynewald]

Looking for opponent any level for 3.10 game. I'm experienced and open to playing either side or mirror games.

[chrisfso]

Sent you a PM

[Cynewald]

replied - but not interested in the 41 scenario as Axis.

[Schnurri]

also sent a PM

[chrisfso]

Willing to play 1940 if you are interested.

[Ortona]

Beware, he was using the kiel canal para trick in my game. You know, send a para through the canal, while it is in there you can upgrade another ABOVE your game-dictated allotment. True paras are not titled "xxxix FJ".

[Cynewald]

Beware, this guy is an idiot. I sent this guy my PW so he could check and had only the alotted number of paras. I don't know what he is talking about with the naming - I always take the name of the GAR (e.g. XXXIX Garrison) and remove the garrison and type in FJR to turn it into a para unit. He is a very sore loser.

[Cynewald]

You send me your PW and I'll post all the moves as an AAR. Ortona or is is Mike Mupawa?

[Ortona]

Whatever, I've never had to name my FJ, they were after all named the 1st, 2nd etc FJ divisions historically, and thats how they come out at the end of training. Please refer to other posts on this subject where the giveaway was the name of the unit. Why on earth would you carryover a corps designation to a division that has no historical significance? It makes no sense. You might note Cynald doesnt say WHY he always does this. As for being a sore loser, I was a long way from beat. I foiled his sealion, forced him to declare Vichy, destroyed his capacity to launch a middle east amphibious invasion by destroying the Italian surface fleet, and forced his Barbarossa into 42 - and no one has ever beat me in those circumstances. My only error was committing the RN to repelling sealion, having it mauled as a result, when there was no way he could land anyway.