Contraction before Impact, then expand?

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
Primarch
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 1:17 am

Contraction before Impact, then expand?

Post by Primarch »

Quick question.


A tactic that has recently come up when facing a better troop type in the impact phase, is to contract into a column, then charge/be charged. Then, when the melee phase occurs, you expand to match the enemy frontage because your troops have a better POA in melee.


Its funny to watch a column slam into a line, to prevent the line from rolling more dice, then expand to gain a competitive edge in the melee phase. Was this the intent?



Thanks,

Clay
lawrenceg
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Former British Empire

Re: Contraction before Impact, then expand?

Post by lawrenceg »

Primarch wrote:Quick question.


A tactic that has recently come up when facing a better troop type in the impact phase, is to contract into a column, then charge/be charged. Then, when the melee phase occurs, you expand to match the enemy frontage because your troops have a better POA in melee.


Its funny to watch a column slam into a line, to prevent the line from rolling more dice, then expand to gain a competitive edge in the melee phase. Was this the intent?



Thanks,

Clay
This tactic was noted in play testing. I suspect it is an unintended side effect of the combat system, which is a fundamental aspect of the game and couldn't be changed.

Note that a BG in column only counts the first three ranks towards 1HP3B, so if it does lose the impact it is certain to get an extra -1 on its CT for this. Also you can only expand by one file in melee. This means the tactic is of limited benefit, except for BGs of 4 bases, which have other disadvantages.
Lawrence Greaves
flameberge
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 5:31 am

Post by flameberge »

It is an interesting tactic that I never thought of.
lawrenceg
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Former British Empire

Post by lawrenceg »

flameberge wrote:It is an interesting tactic that I never thought of.
In general if you are fighting at a disadvantage it is best to minimise the number of bases fighting. Not only does this reduce the hits on you, so making the death roll more survivable, it also decreases the probability of your losing the combat and increases the probability of your winning.
Lawrence Greaves
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

As pointed out earlier there are several issues with this 'tactic'

You pretty much have to be in the column the turn before you charge making you much omre vulnerable to shooting.
In the impact where you have a dissadvantage you will if you lose be at a -1 for HP3B
You can only expand one file so unless you have multiple such columns charging or are facing a 2 wide BG you will be overlapped in the melee.

Hammy
domblas
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 698
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: Montpellier, France

Post by domblas »

it looks like when asterix village men charges roman lines after drinking magic potion

so its historically true :wink:
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”