Comments on good history books/sources? - Dodge on Hannibal?
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
Comments on good history books/sources? - Dodge on Hannibal?
I saw a reprint of Dodge's old book on Alexander and was tempted to get it because it also covers Pyrrhus' battleas as well. Is it a good (reliable) source?
As a general question, what do people with knowledge of history adn archaeology consider the best sources on ancient and medieval warfare. I already have the old WRG Armies and Enemies books, Charles Oman's books, Polybius, Ceaser (Civil War), Thucydides, Herodotus and Arrian.
thanks
Scott
As a general question, what do people with knowledge of history adn archaeology consider the best sources on ancient and medieval warfare. I already have the old WRG Armies and Enemies books, Charles Oman's books, Polybius, Ceaser (Civil War), Thucydides, Herodotus and Arrian.
thanks
Scott
-
miffedofreading
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 317
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:00 pm
- Location: Reading, England
Personally I love the WRG books as they are very wargames orientated.
I think Charles Oman's 16th Century book s is easily the best book on the subject available. His earlier period medieval books make good reading though I don't like them as much as his 16th century book.
I never liked Dodge's books myself, many of his facts and figures seem suspect or rather old fashioned? but that is a very personal opinion.
Many of the ancients, plutarch etc etc are actually very good and surprisingly readable.
I think Charles Oman's 16th Century book s is easily the best book on the subject available. His earlier period medieval books make good reading though I don't like them as much as his 16th century book.
I never liked Dodge's books myself, many of his facts and figures seem suspect or rather old fashioned? but that is a very personal opinion.
Many of the ancients, plutarch etc etc are actually very good and surprisingly readable.
That certainly would be understandable, since Dodge's volumes on Alexander, Hannibal, and Caesar were originally published from 1888-1892.miffedofreading wrote:I never liked Dodge's books myself, many of his facts and figures seem suspect or rather old fashioned?
Also rather outdated IMHO, particularly The Armies and Enemies of Imperial Rome.miffedofreading wrote:Personally I love the WRG books as they are very wargames orientated.
The original sources are always a good place to begin, especially if your translation includes a thorough modern analysis of the author's limitations, perspectives and biases.miffedofreading wrote:Many of the ancients, plutarch etc etc are actually very good and surprisingly readable.
For recent books on ancient and medieval warfare, I would highly recommend the following (most recent editions):
Brian Todd Carey, Warfare in the Ancient World (Pen & Sword, 2006)
---, Warfare in the Medieval World (Pen & Sword, 2006)
Adrian Goldsworthy, Roman Warfare (Phoenix Press, 2007)
Maurice Keen (ed.), Medieval Warfare: A History (Oxford U. Press, 2002)
J.E. Lendon, Soldiers and Ghosts: A History of Battle in Classical Antiquity (Yale U. Press, 2005)
Michael Sage, Warfare in Ancient Greece: A Sourcebook (Routledge, 1996)
---, The Republican Roman Army: A Sourcebook (Routledge, 2008)
Philip Sidnell, Warhorse: Cavalry in Ancient Warfare (Hambledon Continuum, 2006)
There are many others, but these would make for a good start.
Cheers,
Scott
Last edited by ars_belli on Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:07 pm, edited 7 times in total.
-
miffedofreading
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 317
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:00 pm
- Location: Reading, England
Dodge without tears, well costs anyway -
Punic Wars
http://www.archive.org/details/hannibal ... 00dodguoft
Romans
http://www.archive.org/details/caesarhi ... 00dodguoft
Punic Wars
http://www.archive.org/details/hannibal ... 00dodguoft
Romans
http://www.archive.org/details/caesarhi ... 00dodguoft
-
Brainsnaffler
- Senior Corporal - Ju 87G

- Posts: 94
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:25 am
- Location: Barnsley, England
I am just reading a book on Carthage by Gilbert Charles Picard and Collette Picard. It was wrote in the 60's, but IMHO, it makes an excellent analysis of findings and ancient writings to piece together Carthage's history as accurately as possible (questioning many of Polybius', and Pompeus Trogus' writings amongst others).
The thing I like about this book is that it tries wherever possible to use hard archaeological evidence to back up any theories presented and goes into great detail about what the theorised political structure / lifestyles were like.
The downside of this book is that it is SOOOOOO academic that it can send you to sleep after reading the first page! If you can get past that, you will be sure to find some very interesting things discussed within the covers of the book.
The thing I like about this book is that it tries wherever possible to use hard archaeological evidence to back up any theories presented and goes into great detail about what the theorised political structure / lifestyles were like.
The downside of this book is that it is SOOOOOO academic that it can send you to sleep after reading the first page! If you can get past that, you will be sure to find some very interesting things discussed within the covers of the book.





