
The dustbin
Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft, FoG: Leagues&Tourns&SeekingOpponents Subforums mods
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
- Senior Corporal - Destroyer
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:49 pm
Re: Later Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Division C
sirlancelot's Bosporans 15/29 defeated stefano1967(spartacus slave)
sirlancelot's Bosporans 15/29 defeated stefano1967(spartacus slave)
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Div. B
Epicouros (Early North African Fatimids) 9/33 beat CharlesWayneRobinson (Dailami Musafarids) 27/25.
Mostly thanks to Fatimid infantry holding their ground in open terrain, while the cavalry was able to chase away most of the Dailami's allied Kurdish cavalry, then ganged op on the scattered (but still very tough) Dailami medium infantry units.
Epicouros (Early North African Fatimids) 9/33 beat CharlesWayneRobinson (Dailami Musafarids) 27/25.
Mostly thanks to Fatimid infantry holding their ground in open terrain, while the cavalry was able to chase away most of the Dailami's allied Kurdish cavalry, then ganged op on the scattered (but still very tough) Dailami medium infantry units.
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .


These tables will help you identify which players you still have to play and they will tell you which matches we have received results for (at the time these tables are first posted). Just find your name in the left-hand column and read across the page to see your points won - empty boxes mean that we have not received a result for that match. These charts will also tally with the latest league tables posted in the results thread.
-
- Sergeant - Panzer IIC
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:30 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
Re: Later Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Division C
Peterabb (Late Republican Roman 105 – 25 BC) 20/30 defeated sirlancelot22 (Bosporan, late) 29/29
Peterabb (Late Republican Roman 105 – 25 BC) 20/30 defeated sirlancelot22 (Bosporan, late) 29/29
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Div. B
Epicouros (Later Serbian) 21/34 beat mcfcivo (Medieval French) 37/32.
Mostly thanks to a position on a nice big hill.
Epicouros (Later Serbian) 21/34 beat mcfcivo (Medieval French) 37/32.
Mostly thanks to a position on a nice big hill.
-
- Senior Corporal - Destroyer
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:49 pm
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
div b
challenge for.
charleswaynerobinson psw: charles
epicouros psw: epicouros
epos psw: epos
gazxtrix psw: gazxtrix
okie psw: okie
paulmcneil psw: paulmcneil
ricoual74 psw:ricoual74
challenge for.
charleswaynerobinson psw: charles
epicouros psw: epicouros
epos psw: epos
gazxtrix psw: gazxtrix
okie psw: okie
paulmcneil psw: paulmcneil
ricoual74 psw:ricoual74
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:35 am
- Location: Australia
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Div B
Arminius (HYW English) 17/29 vs mcfcivo (Medieval French) 32/32
Arminius (HYW English) 17/29 vs mcfcivo (Medieval French) 32/32
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:47 am
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div A
challenges posted for the macedon boys...here's a classic speedbump for you...the Persians
CharlesWayneRobinson (Later Macedonian 208 – 148 BC) PW speedbump
voskarp (Macedonian Successor 279 – 261 BC) PW speedbump
challenges posted for the macedon boys...here's a classic speedbump for you...the Persians
CharlesWayneRobinson (Later Macedonian 208 – 148 BC) PW speedbump
voskarp (Macedonian Successor 279 – 261 BC) PW speedbump
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:47 am
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Div A
Stockwellpete
PW scotfight
this will certainly be bloody!
Stockwellpete
PW scotfight
this will certainly be bloody!
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Div. D win for Okie:
Brindelbane, Anglo-Irish 40/40
Okie, Middle Hungarian(Crusader) 17/21
Okie
Brindelbane, Anglo-Irish 40/40
Okie, Middle Hungarian(Crusader) 17/21


-
- Sergeant - Panzer IIC
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:30 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
Re: Classical Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Division C
Peterabb (Seleucid Successor 279 – 206 BC) 29/35 defeated tullius (Mid-Republican Roman, later 202 – 106 BC) 39/34
Peterabb (Seleucid Successor 279 – 206 BC) 29/35 defeated tullius (Mid-Republican Roman, later 202 – 106 BC) 39/34
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:31 pm
- Location: Barcelona
Re: Classical Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
DIV C
maulet (Later Macedonian 208 – 148 BC) 29/31
beat
Peterabb (Seleucid Successor 279 – 206 BC) 35/33
thanks
maulet (Later Macedonian 208 – 148 BC) 29/31
beat
Peterabb (Seleucid Successor 279 – 206 BC) 35/33
thanks
Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
Tables updated on page one.
-
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 3:12 pm
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
DIVISION D
New victory of my Aragonese 3/36 against VanDerAalf´s Serbians 33/33
Thanks for the game
New victory of my Aragonese 3/36 against VanDerAalf´s Serbians 33/33
Thanks for the game
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:31 pm
- Location: Barcelona
Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
hello, one question: who pass to the next round, the firsts two of every pool or only the first one?
thanks.
thanks.
Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
Rest easy, the first two goes on to quarter-finalsmaulet wrote:hello, one question: who pass to the next round, the firsts two of every pool or only the first one?
thanks.

-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Some excellent news . . .
Iain from Slitherine posted this yesterday . . .
Re: FoG(U) rev 964 update
by IainMcNeil » 22 Oct 2014 17:10
"Hi guys
We get multiple updates a week from Dan. He think he is very close to a GM. We are not going to predict any dates until its completely done as this has proved very hard up to now!
It is ongoing and it is going to happen."
viewtopic.php?f=97&t=51033
So we are definitely going to get the new version of FOG and I hope it means that the "Wolves From the Sea" and the "Oath of Fealty" expansions should follow afterwards - and maybe the original plan of moving to FOG 2.0 will happen now as well.
Of course, this is tremendous news for those of us playing in the FOG Digital League (and The Slitherine Trophy) because it means these competitions can continue to attract new players over the next few years. One of my main purposes in starting the FOGDL was to try and hold a core of FOG players around the game until such time as Dan and Neurosoft were able to provide us with the new version. Funnily enough, I did actually ask my fellow-organiser Anders (hidde) this week how long we could keep the FOGDL going in the absence of the new version but now my concerns have been addressed completely. I do have some new ideas in the pipeline for Seasons 5,6 and 7 in 2015 and the format of The Slitherine Trophy is likely to change too next year.
Re: FoG(U) rev 964 update
by IainMcNeil » 22 Oct 2014 17:10
"Hi guys
We get multiple updates a week from Dan. He think he is very close to a GM. We are not going to predict any dates until its completely done as this has proved very hard up to now!
It is ongoing and it is going to happen."
viewtopic.php?f=97&t=51033
So we are definitely going to get the new version of FOG and I hope it means that the "Wolves From the Sea" and the "Oath of Fealty" expansions should follow afterwards - and maybe the original plan of moving to FOG 2.0 will happen now as well.

Of course, this is tremendous news for those of us playing in the FOG Digital League (and The Slitherine Trophy) because it means these competitions can continue to attract new players over the next few years. One of my main purposes in starting the FOGDL was to try and hold a core of FOG players around the game until such time as Dan and Neurosoft were able to provide us with the new version. Funnily enough, I did actually ask my fellow-organiser Anders (hidde) this week how long we could keep the FOGDL going in the absence of the new version but now my concerns have been addressed completely. I do have some new ideas in the pipeline for Seasons 5,6 and 7 in 2015 and the format of The Slitherine Trophy is likely to change too next year.
Re: Later Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Division D
McPeake(Early Armenian)24/46 beat MikeMarchant(Early Principate Roman) 35/34 Ditches proved invaluable.
McPeake(Early Armenian)24/46 beat MikeMarchant(Early Principate Roman) 35/34 Ditches proved invaluable.
Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
Pool B, Group B
Poitiers
Praeter, English (14/25) beat Okie, French (50/48)
The English very nearly got swamped by the French hordes!
Poitiers
Praeter, English (14/25) beat Okie, French (50/48)
The English very nearly got swamped by the French hordes!