The dustbin
Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft, FoG: Leagues&Tourns&SeekingOpponents Subforums mods
-
- Senior Corporal - Destroyer
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:32 pm
- Location: Bristol, UK
Re: Later Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div C
Challenge for tullius - p/w: tullius
Challenge for tullius - p/w: tullius
-
- Senior Corporal - Destroyer
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:32 pm
- Location: Bristol, UK
Re: Later Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Div C
PeterGuest's Visigoths defeat Stefano's Spartacans (47/49 vs 41/38)
Embarrassingly poorly led Goths somehow managed to just scrape over the line against the gladiators and slaves - sheer weight of numbers tipped the balance in the end
PeterGuest's Visigoths defeat Stefano's Spartacans (47/49 vs 41/38)
Embarrassingly poorly led Goths somehow managed to just scrape over the line against the gladiators and slaves - sheer weight of numbers tipped the balance in the end
Re: Classical Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Div. D win for Okie:
Brindlebane, Later Macidonian 34/32
Okie, Selucid Successor 26/29
Great fight!

Brindlebane, Later Macidonian 34/32
Okie, Selucid Successor 26/29
Great fight!


Re: Classical Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Div D
gamercb (Late Ptolemaic Greek 18/29 beat Okie (Seleucids Successor 30/29)
Could have gone either way but this time the dice favoured me.
Thanks for the game.
gamercb (Late Ptolemaic Greek 18/29 beat Okie (Seleucids Successor 30/29)
Could have gone either way but this time the dice favoured me.
Thanks for the game.
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:07 pm
- Location: Hamble, UK
- Contact:
Re: Classical Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Division C
paulmcneil Rhoxolani Sarmatians 4/30 beat Tullius mid-republican Romans 38/32
paulmcneil Rhoxolani Sarmatians 4/30 beat Tullius mid-republican Romans 38/32
Paul McNeil
Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
pool a, group a, Bouvines
Ricoual (angevins) 47/58 beat Jonathan (french) 55/52
Thanks for a great scenari
eric
Ricoual (angevins) 47/58 beat Jonathan (french) 55/52
Thanks for a great scenari
eric
Re: Themed event: arrange your matches here . . .
pool a group a
challenge for cromlechi for poitiers
pw: cromlechi
Ricoual
challenge for cromlechi for poitiers
pw: cromlechi
Ricoual
Re: Later Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Div. B
Epicouros (Later Ptolemaic, Roman 55-30 BC) 25/29 beat steve-h8 (Pontic, late 84-63 BC) 49/47
Almost overwhelmed by superior numbers, my flanks held on by their fingernails, both dealing and sustaining heavy damage, until the Pontic centre was finally destroyed by the Ptolemaic heavy foot. At last, and in the nick of time...
Epicouros (Later Ptolemaic, Roman 55-30 BC) 25/29 beat steve-h8 (Pontic, late 84-63 BC) 49/47
Almost overwhelmed by superior numbers, my flanks held on by their fingernails, both dealing and sustaining heavy damage, until the Pontic centre was finally destroyed by the Ptolemaic heavy foot. At last, and in the nick of time...
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Div. B
Epicouros (Early North African Fatimids) 23/35 beat mcfcivo (Maurikian Byzantines) 34/29.
Not an easy battle, especially in the early stages. What did the Byzantines in (I think) was that their infantry only came to the rescue of the cavalry when it was a turn or two too late. The Byzantine cavalry had performed well, but was too battered in the end to operate without infantry support. Just like the Fatimid cavalry, actually, though they got their infantry support, which sometimes resulted in gruesome losses for the poor footsloggers, and didn't always save the cavalry. Still, it paid off in the end.
Epicouros (Early North African Fatimids) 23/35 beat mcfcivo (Maurikian Byzantines) 34/29.
Not an easy battle, especially in the early stages. What did the Byzantines in (I think) was that their infantry only came to the rescue of the cavalry when it was a turn or two too late. The Byzantine cavalry had performed well, but was too battered in the end to operate without infantry support. Just like the Fatimid cavalry, actually, though they got their infantry support, which sometimes resulted in gruesome losses for the poor footsloggers, and didn't always save the cavalry. Still, it paid off in the end.
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:12 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
Group A, Pool A Poitiers
Jonathan4290 (French) 33/48 defeats Ricoual74 (Anglo-Gascons) 29/25
Jonathan4290 (French) 33/48 defeats Ricoual74 (Anglo-Gascons) 29/25
Check out my website, The Art of Battle: Animated Battle Maps, where I recreate the greatest battles and campaigns of history: http://www.theartofbattle.com
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 9:17 am
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Division C
tullius (Later Serbs) 17/33 bt PaulMcNeil (Anglo Irish) 38/37
tullius (Later Serbs) 17/33 bt PaulMcNeil (Anglo Irish) 38/37
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:12 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
div A
Challenge up for Demetrios, pw: Canada
Challenge up for Demetrios, pw: Canada
Check out my website, The Art of Battle: Animated Battle Maps, where I recreate the greatest battles and campaigns of history: http://www.theartofbattle.com
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:47 am
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Division A
klayeckles (scots) 21/47 vs rexhurley (teutonic nites) 46/43
scots overtook the soft gooey center of the Teutonic boys (poor MF) and did leathel damage before the knights could save the day
klayeckles (scots) 21/47 vs rexhurley (teutonic nites) 46/43
scots overtook the soft gooey center of the Teutonic boys (poor MF) and did leathel damage before the knights could save the day
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:47 am
Re: Classical Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Division A
klayeckles (Persians) 38/43 vs rexhurley (saka) 42/42
Persians sacked a camp and found the women and children...that was just enough to win the day before the cav had its way.
klayeckles (Persians) 38/43 vs rexhurley (saka) 42/42
Persians sacked a camp and found the women and children...that was just enough to win the day before the cav had its way.
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:12 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Div A
Jonathan4290 (Nubians) 16/43 defeats Tullius (Arabs) 39/38
Jonathan4290 (Nubians) 16/43 defeats Tullius (Arabs) 39/38
Check out my website, The Art of Battle: Animated Battle Maps, where I recreate the greatest battles and campaigns of history: http://www.theartofbattle.com
Re: There is still a vacancy in High Middle Ages . . .
Is this one still available ?
-
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:47 pm
- Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Re: Themed event: arrange your matches here . . .
Pool A Group C
Challenge for Cunningcairn (B), Poitiers 1356, password: cunning
Challenge for Cunningcairn (B), Poitiers 1356, password: cunning
-
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:47 pm
- Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div. A
Challenge for ricoual74 (Galatians 189 BC), password: rico
Challenge for ricoual74 (Galatians 189 BC), password: rico
-
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:47 pm
- Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Div B
Challenge for mcfcivo (Medieval French, 1350-1399), password: mcfc
Challenge for mcfcivo (Medieval French, 1350-1399), password: mcfc
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: There is still a vacancy in High Middle Ages . . .
Yes, it is. You have PM. 
