
Above is my army for this weeks battle vs the might of Rome.
My dilema is , should I run 3 units of 4 cataphracts for 2 units of 6 ?
Any other suggestions ?
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Not necessarily. The latest thinking is that the early Sassanid army probably did not differ much from the later Parthian army (whatever that implies).spike wrote:Also the majority of the "Cavalry" were not Catafracts but Armoured Bow Sword Cavalrypetedalby wrote:Personally I'd go with 3 x 4.
I see you have your LH as protected. In the beta test list they were unprotected. I guess we won't know until the list is published but most LH is unprotected.
Pete
I would go for 2 x 6s personally and try to get a TC in with each.Last time I used the army I ran 3 BGs of 4 cataphracts. Next time I will run 2 BGs of 6 to get more "bang" from my commanders leading from the front.
This, however, will reduce manouvrability, so I think it is very much "swings and roundabouts".
I don't think I would want to run 2 BGs of 6 cataphracts without Cavalry to protect their flanks.

Not sure why you'd want to use catafracts in a single line anyway, except perhaps against LHcaliban66 wrote:I think you have few BG. I would try 3x4 Cat. Six in a line is not very manouverable. You may have to keep some bases in a second line, and that would be a waste of points.

Always a difficult call. 10 BG at 650 is probably okay so maybe create one more BG.Keith wrote:Now I only have 9 BG's.
Should I try and increase the numberof BG's by splitting up my LH and LF into smaller BG's ?
This would increase the break point at which my army will rout , but make by BG's more fragile ?
