Voulgiers
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:53 pm
Voulgiers
I'm thinking of putting together a Medieval French starter army (as per Storm of Arrows) -- what is a Voulgier? I can't seem to find anything on this.
Also, French men-at-arms are knights -- so does that mean they are mounted? Why aren't there any infantry men-at-arms for the French?
Thanks,
OrkConvert
Also, French men-at-arms are knights -- so does that mean they are mounted? Why aren't there any infantry men-at-arms for the French?
Thanks,
OrkConvert
A Voulgier is a man using a voulge. It's a kind of polearm.
Have a look at this for some examples.
http://medieval.ucdavis.edu/20C/voulge.gif
Regarding the lack of foot men-at-arms, I don't think the French were particularly fond of dismounting in this period. If memory serves they were supposed to dismount for the attack at Agincourt but didn't and we all know how that ended....
Cheers,
Alex
Have a look at this for some examples.
http://medieval.ucdavis.edu/20C/voulge.gif
Regarding the lack of foot men-at-arms, I don't think the French were particularly fond of dismounting in this period. If memory serves they were supposed to dismount for the attack at Agincourt but didn't and we all know how that ended....
Cheers,
Alex
-
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:53 pm
I doubt you'd find many horsemen trying to fight with a voulge! It'd be very hard work and probably not that practical! I would think that by far and away the bulk of French mounted men-at-arms would have fought with lance and a secondary weapon - sword, mace, whatever.
At a guess, I'd say that the reason you'd not find voulgiers mentioned in literature is they probably wind up being called halberdiers or similar. That's a misnomer of sorts, but not a big one. They're similar in design and function.
Cheers,
Alex
At a guess, I'd say that the reason you'd not find voulgiers mentioned in literature is they probably wind up being called halberdiers or similar. That's a misnomer of sorts, but not a big one. They're similar in design and function.
Cheers,
Alex
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
French men-at-arms can always dismount if you want them to - see page 38 of the Storm of Arrows list book, 2nd bullet - dismounting was a very common tactic learnt from the English.Morange wrote:
Regarding the lack of foot men-at-arms, I don't think the French were particularly fond of dismounting in this period. If memory serves they were supposed to dismount for the attack at Agincourt but didn't and we all know how that ended....
BTW at Agincourt only a few hundred stayed on horses the majority fought on foot.
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
-
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:53 pm
So does it make sense to have BGs of dismounted French men-at-arms then too?
If the starter rules are 3 BGs of knights -- that would be 36 mounted figures.
English starter rules for dismounted men-at-arms are 3 BGs too -- but that's 48 figures.
So should dismounted French go 1 BG to 1 BG -- i.e. more infantry than cav when dismounted?
Thanks!
If the starter rules are 3 BGs of knights -- that would be 36 mounted figures.
English starter rules for dismounted men-at-arms are 3 BGs too -- but that's 48 figures.
So should dismounted French go 1 BG to 1 BG -- i.e. more infantry than cav when dismounted?
Thanks!
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
True, but if you are about to come up against wall to wall pikemen / spearmen, then Heavy Weapon foot with heavy armour are definitely a better option.I've never yet seen the need to dismount knights. They're some bloody expensive HF given that their melee dice are halved when they dismount.
In fact you could possibly only dismount some, to create a hole which could then be expolited by the knights. It is a tactic I want to try out, once we get that bloody book delivered and people can use Greeks I will find out

-
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:53 pm