Hey all.
So I read that FoG can be played solo according to this: http://www.fieldofglory.com/introduction.html Has anyone tried it, not to test the rules with small training scenarios but an actual battle? What was it like?
Solo?
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:23 pm
- Location: Portland, Oregon US
I played a solitaire game using the model Roman and Carthaginian lists from the rulebook. While any solitaire game requires a certain amount of schizophrenia
, the mechanics for CMT and other variables make for a pretty good solo game. I suspect that an army of primarily undrilled troops will make a better 'automatic' opponent than, say, Romans, who don't have to take many CMT's. Two undrilled armies would quite fun, I think.
To reduce the effect of unconscious favoritism, I'll draw up three battle plans for each side, and choose randomly.

To reduce the effect of unconscious favoritism, I'll draw up three battle plans for each side, and choose randomly.
-
- Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 12:23 pm
- Location: Harlow, Essex, UK
I have played several solo games (3 I think) while I was learning the rules. I have saeveral pretty simple Biblical armies which each have their own personality, and I play them against one another to get a feel for each of the new rules sets I try out. Nice way to compare the feel of the different rules, and get to learn the mechanics at the same time.
FoG works OK solo, though I found working out the complex combats between several units a challenge until I got a feel for the rules. IMHO a better solo game than DBM.
John
FoG works OK solo, though I found working out the complex combats between several units a challenge until I got a feel for the rules. IMHO a better solo game than DBM.
John