However, recently we find ourselves divided in the following question/situation regarding second move. We used one of the following Interpretations, but upon re-reading the rules, we discussed a second interpretation. Currently, we feel a bit uneasy as to which one is correct. Please free us from our misery
Interpretation 1
1. A unit makes a simple move (first move) directly forward. Nearest enemy is 18 MU away.
2. The player wants to make a "2nd move if over 6MU from enemy throughout".
3. This 2nd move is intended to be another move forward.
4, The player spends a CP and rolls for CMT, since a "2nd move if over 6MU from enemy throughout" is a Complex Move.
5. He fails the CMT.
6. The unit cannot make the intended move.
7. This unit's moves ends for this turn.
Interpretation 2
1. A unit makes a simple move (first move) directly forward. Nearest enemy is 18 MU away.
2. The player wants to make a "2nd move if over 6MU from enemy throughout".
3. This 2nd move is intended to be another move forward.
4, The player spends a CP and rolls for CMT, since a "2nd move if over 6MU from enemy throughout" is a Complex Move.
5. He fails the CMT.
6. The unit cannot make the intended move.
7. BUT, since there is a rule which states, "If a unit or Brigade Group fails its CMT, it can still make a simple move" (pg 46), this unit CAN make that move forward (which is a "Simple Move").
Also the rules stated that if a unit fails a CMT, it cannot attempt anymore CMT. It doesn't say if the unit fails the CMT, the move is cancelled.
8. This unit makes a move forward (a simple move).
Which of the above interpretation is correct and why?




