knights and elephants part 2

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
papsterdino
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:45 pm

knights and elephants part 2

Post by papsterdino »

In dementia land a unit of knights is facing a wall of spears, right behind the knights are a unit of enemy elephants also,

Do the knights have to test not to charge, or don't have to as they could end their move in contact with elephants?
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Re: knights and elephants part 2

Post by hazelbark »

They do not. You do not test if... applies because of elephants I believe it says clearly.
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3070
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Re: knights and elephants part 2

Post by grahambriggs »

assuming that the elephants could intercept the knights no the knights don't have to test.
papsterdino
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:45 pm

Re: knights and elephants part 2

Post by papsterdino »

Hi Graham as per our chat at weekend p63 bullet 5 if their move could end in contact with elephants,
this implies to me it is the move of the knights that must contact as it says (their move) must end in contact,
so elephants on a flank or rear intercept are rested as any other troop type to me. As it may have said any movement that ends in contact with elephants stops a charge without orders ? Have look and see what you think cheers Dino.
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3111
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Re: knights and elephants part 2

Post by petedalby »

Hi Dino - I wasn't privy to your chat with Graham and this is an area of the rules where I struggled too. But think about it this way....

The Knights have enemy elephants to their rear and other enemy to their front. If they do charge, they might be intercepted by the enemy elephants. Therefore their move could end in contact with elephants. Therefore they do not have to test not to charge.

I think it could have been worded more clearly but I'm fairly sure that most people interpret it and play it this way, at least in my experience.

Hope that helps.
Pete
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: knights and elephants part 2

Post by ravenflight »

petedalby wrote:Therefore their move could end in contact with elephants. Therefore they do not have to test not to charge.
Yeah, it's a bit of a slippery slope actually.

For example, what if way way way down the right hand flank a BG of elephants is on the flank of one of your BG's. You have a massive long line of 10 BG's. On the other flank is your knights.

"they don't have to test, because IF I charge with the unit way way way over there I could get intercept charged and the elephants could break the BG on contact and continue down the line destroying all in their path and thus I could get contacted by elephants."

I'm deliberately being over-the-top, but my point being where DO you draw the line?

As you say, it could have been a little clearer.
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Re: knights and elephants part 2

Post by gozerius »

I draw the line where a BG is in the ZOI of a BG of elephants, or will enter the ZOI. If either of these applies, the charger could end its charge in contact with them, so does not need to test.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8835
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: knights and elephants part 2

Post by philqw78 »

This is the same as shock foot not having to charge if they could contact mounted. They don't, even if its an intercept.

I'm pretty sure a very similar question was asked a number of years ago.

Since you are suffering dementia perhaps it was you that asked then as well Dino :wink:
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3070
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Re: knights and elephants part 2

Post by grahambriggs »

papsterdino wrote:Hi Graham as per our chat at weekend p63 bullet 5 if their move could end in contact with elephants,
this implies to me it is the move of the knights that must contact as it says (their move) must end in contact,
so elephants on a flank or rear intercept are rested as any other troop type to me. As it may have said any movement that ends in contact with elephants stops a charge without orders ? Have look and see what you think cheers Dino.
The difficulty for me is it isn't clear what is meant by "their move". Could mean "their declared charge movement", in which case I'd agree with you. But equally it could mean "their impact phase" - so in the sense of "their turn". Or it could mean "any bases that move" - well if you are flank/rear intercepted by elephants at least one base will move.

Given the blurriness, I think go with the straightforward solution of they don't have to test.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”