Shock troops test not to charge in varying circumstances. In these circumstances their charge distance is taken as +2MU. Does this mean that MF shock troops 6MU, or HF shock 5MU, from troops they would normally charge must test not to, or just charge of their own free will once within 6/5MU with little chance of impact.
TIA
phil
Charge distances and CMT's not to
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
You've mixed up 2 different things
They test if enemy are in normal charge reach
This is the core rule
THEN
They do not test if the move might take MF out of terrain for example.
When considering when they don't have to charge you see if their max VMD would take them out of terrain if the target can evade
So the +2 MU only applies to deciding if they are an exception and allowed not to test
Si
They test if enemy are in normal charge reach
This is the core rule
THEN
They do not test if the move might take MF out of terrain for example.
When considering when they don't have to charge you see if their max VMD would take them out of terrain if the target can evade
So the +2 MU only applies to deciding if they are an exception and allowed not to test
Si
-
sagji
- Sergeant Major - Armoured Train

- Posts: 567
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:13 pm
- Location: Manchester, UK
Not their max but any VMD - in some circumstances a max VMD would get them safely to a new terrain piece while a min VMD would leave them in the open, in this case they don't test.shall wrote: They do not test if the move might take MF out of terrain for example.
When considering when they don't have to charge you see if their max VMD would take them out of terrain if the target can evade
So the +2 MU only applies to deciding if they are an exception and allowed not to test
Si
We are planning a special Rule Lawyers supplement full of apparently inconsistent concepts and ambiguous grammar especially for this niche market. I believe they will only be available from an underground shop in the West End. nd we may have John Cleese to provide the full 5 minute argument at a special FOG discount price.
Si
Si
-
sagji
- Sergeant Major - Armoured Train

- Posts: 567
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:13 pm
- Location: Manchester, UK
"Was it the full half hour, or just the 5 minute argument you wanted?"shall wrote:We are planning a special Rule Lawyers supplement full of apparently inconsistent concepts and ambiguous grammar especially for this niche market. I believe they will only be available from an underground shop in the West End. nd we may have John Cleese to provide the full 5 minute argument at a special FOG discount price.![]()
![]()
![]()
Si
Will there be a special gold plated edition as well?shall wrote:We are planning a special Rule Lawyers supplement full of apparently inconsistent concepts and ambiguous grammar especially for this niche market. I believe they will only be available from an underground shop in the West End. nd we may have John Cleese to provide the full 5 minute argument at a special FOG discount price.![]()
![]()
![]()
Si


