Peltasts

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
will05
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:04 pm

Peltasts

Post by will05 »

Hi
Anyone know whats going to happen with Peltasts. I see something called traditional Peltasts in the Pergamene list and they are given as light foot.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Peltasts who skirmish are LF. The later "peltasts" who had spears are classified as MF/HF Offensive Spear - these are the thyreophoroi types.
will05
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:04 pm

Post by will05 »

Thanks for that Nik
Jhykron
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:01 pm

Post by Jhykron »

nikgaukroger wrote:Peltasts who skirmish are LF. The later "peltasts" who had spears are classified as MF/HF Offensive Spear - these are the thyreophoroi types.
Do the FOG lists subscribe to Luke Ueda Sarson's hypotheses about the evolution of Hellenistic foot, then?
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

Jhykron wrote:
nikgaukroger wrote:Peltasts who skirmish are LF. The later "peltasts" who had spears are classified as MF/HF Offensive Spear - these are the thyreophoroi types.
Do the FOG lists subscribe to Luke Ueda Sarson's hypotheses about the evolution of Hellenistic foot, then?
Yes
Jhykron
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:01 pm

Post by Jhykron »

rbodleyscott wrote:Yes
Cool. I'm not sure I buy the whole theory... I'm a bit fuzzy on his conclusions about terms like Euzonoi, and maybe even about how widespread the Iphikratean reforms acutally were, but as a whole it makes a lot more sense than what came before.
Agesilaus
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:21 am

Post by Agesilaus »

Further to this, where would that put peltasts (Thracian and Greek) used by Greek Hoplite armies of the Peloponessian War era? I am wondering what I wil need to rebase? What about latr in the Macedonian armies? I was hoping to base up my peltasts in a way that could satisfy each list, if possible.

Also, what about the Ekidromoi reported in Spartan armies? LF or MF?

thanks

Scott Elaurant
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Peltasts of that period will be LF.

Ekdromoi - assuming I'm recalling correctly who they were - are not represented separately but subsumed within the hoplite BG; the fact that HF can sometimes catch evading LF allows for some of their effect IMO.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”