Cham Spearmen

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
Lemmy
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:57 am

Cham Spearmen

Post by Lemmy »

I have a Cham army for DBM that I never got around to paining. In DBA I believe that Cham spearmen are mounted 4 to a base & classified as Aux. In FOG would this be medium foot or mob? My guess is that they would be something like Medium Foot, Light Spear, Protected, Average, Undrilled. Would this be a fair classification pending the publication of an official Cham list in some (distant) future supplement?
richnz
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:41 am

Post by richnz »

medium foot, and the rest sounds about right. They may be swordsmen as well.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28284
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Cham Spearmen

Post by rbodleyscott »

Lemmy wrote:I have a Cham army for DBM that I never got around to paining. In DBA I believe that Cham spearmen are mounted 4 to a base & classified as Aux. In FOG would this be medium foot or mob? My guess is that they would be something like Medium Foot, Light Spear, Protected, Average, Undrilled. Would this be a fair classification pending the publication of an official Cham list in some (distant) future supplement?
I am afraid I cannot give you an official view on this classification as we haven't started on a Cham list yet.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

I'll give you an unofficial view though - if the Khmer reliefs are anything to go by Swordsmen will not be an option.

Of course that would depend on the Cham being similar enough to the Khmer - and my memory being good :shock:
domblas
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 698
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: Montpellier, France

Post by domblas »

if u have that cham army from outpost umust have plenty of javelinmens some uncovered with small shield, some covered with leather jacket and small shield and covered with jacket and long shield. will they be unprotected/protected/armored?

when shall we expect some official arrival of such an army? RBS said once 2009, will it be early 2009? or end of?

fogly
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Not early as supplements have been announced for then.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
Rudy_Nelson
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:16 am

Post by Rudy_Nelson »

It would be nice to be alble to construct list troop options based on the available castings by manufacturers but that is not realistic.
Companies are expected to produce masters based on cited works. I can remember back in the 1970s and 1980s when a new popular set of Ancient rules would be released, sometimes exiting troop type castings would not reflect the troop types given in the new rules. So a similar thing may happen now but it will not be a frequent of an issue as it was decades ago.
Weapon and armor types are less specific and the variety of existing sculpts are far greater than they were.

Oops, I need to get off the soap box but this is a question that normally gets asked of me at conventions. the chicken or the egg came first type of question.

As other stated, based on the specific question of the old four to a base mounted adn classificed as Auxila. This would be a drilled Medium Foot classification. Whether that is adopted for the Cham as a troop type will be discussed by the design team.
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”