P&S formations

Moderators: terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design

Post Reply
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

P&S formations

Post by ravenflight »

I've just realised that I may have been doing something wrong in the rules.

On occasion I have formed 2 wide 3 deep formations for various reasons. This appears to be an illegal formation. Am I correct?

It seems that 1 wide or 3 wide are the ONLY legal formations.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: P&S formations

Post by rbodleyscott »

ravenflight wrote:I've just realised that I may have been doing something wrong in the rules.

On occasion I have formed 2 wide 3 deep formations for various reasons. This appears to be an illegal formation. Am I correct?

It seems that 1 wide or 3 wide are the ONLY legal formations.
Correct, except when you have to drop back elements when charging, routing etc., or when in combat in a column and you want to expand but can only expand 1 file per turn.
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: P&S formations

Post by ravenflight »

rbodleyscott wrote:
ravenflight wrote:I've just realised that I may have been doing something wrong in the rules.

On occasion I have formed 2 wide 3 deep formations for various reasons. This appears to be an illegal formation. Am I correct?

It seems that 1 wide or 3 wide are the ONLY legal formations.
Correct, except when you have to drop back elements when charging, routing etc., or when in combat in a column and you want to expand but can only expand 1 file per turn.
Thanks Richard.
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Re: P&S formations

Post by timmy1 »

Ravenflight, you would not be Australian perchance?
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: P&S formations

Post by ravenflight »

timmy1 wrote:Ravenflight, you would not be Australian perchance?
Err... why?

I'm running MOAB in Sydney, I guess I MIGHT be???
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Re: P&S formations

Post by timmy1 »

No particular reason (use of illegal tactics and all that...)
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: P&S formations

Post by ravenflight »

timmy1 wrote:No particular reason (use of illegal tactics and all that...)
Oh, I get it - sorry a bit slow.

YES, I am an ex-Convict.

My mother (who is into genealogy) has found a convict in our family tree. He was put into gaol for a week for swearing at a women in front of a church on a Sunday.

I'm not quite sure what that means:

If it wasn't a:
1) Woman;
2) In front of a Church; or,
3) on a Sunday.

Would he have been imprisoned?
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Re: P&S formations

Post by timmy1 »

Australia, the only country in the world where being descended from a convict brings social cachet rather than disgrace. I wonder if, rather like medieval Europe where genealogy 'research' traced a link back to Joseph or similar, there will be an industry grow up tracing family trees back to a semi-mythical 'first-convict'...
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: P&S formations

Post by ravenflight »

timmy1 wrote:Australia, the only country in the world where being descended from a convict brings social cachet rather than disgrace. I wonder if, rather like medieval Europe where genealogy 'research' traced a link back to Joseph or similar, there will be an industry grow up tracing family trees back to a semi-mythical 'first-convict'...
Yes, there already is. Anyone who is anyone has a convict from the first fleet in their family tree.

It's total BS.

The vast majority of Anglo-Aust population came in the '50's. As it stands my mum's reaearch is genuine, but only a minor infraction not a real 'convict' per se.

My mum's maternal line is the only line that goes back prior to 1900. The rest were later.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”