Army List Errata

nikgaukroger · Post by **nikgaukroger** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:38 am

Just thought it may be useful for people to flag any possible errata for the army lists in one place - perhaps a moderator could make this sticky?

One I know has been pointed out on one of the FoG Yahoo lists:

Rise of Rome, page 18 in the Gallic list the LF Javelinmen in the main list and allied list should have Javelins shooting capability.

petedalby · Post by **petedalby** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 8:20 am

Good call Nik.

Italian Condotta - Venetian Stradiots - fielded as Cavalry they retain a shooting capability with javelins? I didn't think that was possible? And the points look wrong to me but as I don't have my rules yet I can't be certain.

Pete

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 8:24 am

petedalby wrote:Good call Nik.

Italian Condotta - Venetian Stradiots - fielded as Cavalry they retain a shooting capability with javelins? I didn't think that was possible? And the points look wrong to me but as I don't have my rules yet I can't be certain.

Thanks Pete, they should not have javelins capability - take that away and the points are correct.

MADcozy · Post by **MADcozy** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:29 am

Rise of Rome - page 43 - Later Seleucid list. Troop Type headings 'Armour,Quality,Training' are printed in wrong order.

MADcozy

davem · Post by **davem** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:33 am

Just having a quick scan through "Storm of Arrows" and I see on P 30, Anglo-Irish, the Galloglaigh have a shooting capability of -3.

Is this to represent their legendary skill at "dodge-ball" in avoiding incoming missiles, or the minor shooting effect of hurling potatoes at their opponents?

I really can't believe it it could be so mundane as to be a typo....

Regards

Dave M

nikgaukroger · Post by **nikgaukroger** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:39 am

davem wrote:
Is this to represent their legendary skill at "dodge-ball" in avoiding incoming missiles, or the minor shooting effect of hurling potatoes at their opponents?

Dodge-ball as potatoes had not been introduced to Ireland at this date

nicofig · Post by **nicofig** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:27 pm

Hi Nick,
it would be a good thing if you edit your first post in this topic to have a list of errata confirmed.

After, if you want, I could create a pdf to download and to print it.

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:43 pm

nicofig wrote:Hi Nick,
it would be a good thing if you edit your first post in this topic to have a list of errata confirmed.
After, if you want, I could create a pdf to download and to print it.

No need. The errata will be posted on the official FoG site.

nicofig · Post by **nicofig** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:45 pm

OK, it will be perfect. And when do you think this errata and the faq will be posted ?

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:04 pm

nicofig wrote:OK, it will be perfect. And when do you think this errata and the faq will be posted ?

Soon. I have already sent several updates to JD.

nicofig · Post by **nicofig** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 2:14 pm

Thank you Richard. It's a great thing than you are so close with the players.

hood_mick · Post by **hood_mick** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 12:00 pm

Swiss page 60. knights and men-at-arms, bases per BG states 4-8. Should this be 4-6.

nikgaukroger · Post by **nikgaukroger** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Probably as there are no other 8 base BGs - however, it is always possible that we had a reason and there is nothing that says you can't have an 8 base mounted unit.

It may be a "feature" of the list

hammy · Post by **hammy** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:40 pm

nikgaukroger wrote:Probably as there are no other 8 base BGs - however, it is always possible that we had a reason and there is nothing that says you can't have an 8 base mounted unit.

It may be a "feature" of the list

Hmm, let me think, an 8 base average BG that costs a mere 168 points. Somehow I don't see it as a game breaker, infact I challenge anyone to try using it and do well.

hazelbark · Post by **hazelbark** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 2:01 pm

hammy wrote: Hmm, let me think, an 8 base average BG that costs a mere 168 points. Somehow I don't see it as a game breaker, infact I challenge anyone to try using it and do well.

No imagination it can be easily featured in a 2400 point game.

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 2:12 pm

hood_mick wrote:Swiss page 60. knights and men-at-arms, bases per BG states 4-8. Should this be 4-6.

Yes

Maniakes · Post by **Maniakes** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 2:17 pm

a small typo - in Storm of Arrows, page 17 - the WoTR list. The Mercenary Handgunners have Protected as a Troop Type when it should be an armour class.

hood_mick · Post by **hood_mick** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 3:10 pm

Medieval Castillian, page 81, Javelinmen, Medium Foot, Unprotected, Poor. The U has been missed off Unprotected.

babyshark · Post by **babyshark** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:08 pm

No matter how many times you check, double check, and recheck again there are always typos that slip through. It is really frustrating, isn't it?

Marc

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:26 pm

babyshark wrote:No matter how many times you check, double check, and recheck again there are always typos that slip through. It is really frustrating, isn't it?

Yup

Army List Errata

Army List Errata

Army List Error

Anglo-Irish typo?

Re: Anglo-Irish typo?