Medieval warfare? Not even close . . .

PC/Mac : Digital version of the popular tabletop gaming system. Fight battles on your desktop in single and mutiplayer!

Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14501
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Medieval warfare? Not even close . . .

Post by stockwellpete »

Jonathan4290 wrote:So in the DAG lists, make English longbowmen elite. Problem solved :P
Yes. If you are allowed to pick a maximum of 16 longbowmen units then make it 0-8 superior and 0-8 average.
Old_Warrior
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 3:13 am

Re: Medieval warfare? Not even close . . .

Post by Old_Warrior »

Multi-hex units are a programmers nightmare. I work for John Tiller and the concept of having the Extended Line formations actually be ONE unit was just too much for him to tackle. Same with artillery that went into extended line.

I would love to see a "hex-less" game very much like miniatures where the width and depth of a unit were much more accurate. At this scale you have a phalanx having the same size as any other unit.
TheGrayMouser
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5001
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm

Re: Medieval warfare? Not even close . . .

Post by TheGrayMouser »

Old_Warrior wrote:Multi-hex units are a programmers nightmare. I work for John Tiller and the concept of having the Extended Line formations actually be ONE unit was just too much for him to tackle. Same with artillery that went into extended line.

I would love to see a "hex-less" game very much like miniatures where the width and depth of a unit were much more accurate. At this scale you have a phalanx having the same size as any other unit.
Well, that's because he (JT) would have to retrograde ALL the games in a series to accommodate just that one change so it would be a nightmare! TGBOH games , what , circa 1996??, were able to pull it off flawlessly. I too would love a "hexless game" but is it even possible for an AI to operate in that environment? (assuming turn based of course as Realtime games arnt hexbased, but sometime ago I read /heard that its actually easier to program an AI in a realtime game for some voodoo techie math related reason LOL ...)
Pseudonius
Private First Class - Wehrmacht Inf
Private First Class - Wehrmacht Inf
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:32 pm

Re: Medieval warfare? Not even close . . .

Post by Pseudonius »

stockwellpete wrote:
Jonathan4290 wrote:So in the DAG lists, make English longbowmen elite. Problem solved :P
Yes. If you are allowed to pick a maximum of 16 longbowmen units then make it 0-8 superior and 0-8 average.
Well...I tried setting the longbowmen as Elite in a small test scenario and it appeared to make no difference whatsoever to the impact of their shooting - nor did extending the range of their bows, which didn't work period. Disappointing...
TheGrayMouser
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5001
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm

Re: Medieval warfare? Not even close . . .

Post by TheGrayMouser »

Pseudonius wrote:
stockwellpete wrote:
Jonathan4290 wrote:So in the DAG lists, make English longbowmen elite. Problem solved :P
Yes. If you are allowed to pick a maximum of 16 longbowmen units then make it 0-8 superior and 0-8 average.
Well...I tried setting the longbowmen as Elite in a small test scenario and it appeared to make no difference whatsoever to the impact of their shooting - nor did extending the range of their bows, which didn't work period. Disappointing...
Quality has a big impact on shooting, dice re-rolls, elite bows should do very well... Just how small was your test scenario? Nothing will effect the range....
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory Digital”