Impetuous charges

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
miffedofreading
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:00 pm
Location: Reading, England

Impetuous charges

Post by miffedofreading »

Just making sure I have got this right.

Both shock foot and shock cavalry normally have to charge an opponent within charge reach (there are exceptions) UNLESS they pass a CMT.

This seems as you would expect for Knights, fanatical warbands etc. My reading of it is that it applies to any lance armed mounted troops except lights so this includes Byzantine and similar disciplined mounted. Likewise it applie to Impact foot, offensive spear and pike, so all macedonians, greek hoplites and imperial Roman legionaries as well as impetuous types.

Did I get that right?

Presumably most of the time if the bad guys in front are in charge range and you have shock troops then you would want to charge anyway. But if you decided to NOT charge then you would have to roll for each legionary battlegroup 1 by 1 and any that failed the test would have to charge whilst their colleagues would then NOT be allowed to charge as you already decided not to??

If that is correct then if you have greater than 1 shock battlegroup together within charge range of a viable enemy it would be very risky NOT to let them charge straight away....

Please advise if I have misunderstood. I am OK with this if it is the rules, it just seems slightly unusual, I expected it to say "Undrilled" Shock troops charge if they fail a CMT....

Andy
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Re: Impetuous charges

Post by hammy »

miffedofreading wrote:Just making sure I have got this right.

Both shock foot and shock cavalry normally have to charge an opponent within charge reach (there are exceptions) UNLESS they pass a CMT.

This seems as you would expect for Knights, fanatical warbands etc. My reading of it is that it applies to any lance armed mounted troops except lights so this includes Byzantine and similar disciplined mounted. Likewise it applie to Impact foot, offensive spear and pike, so all macedonians, greek hoplites and imperial Roman legionaries as well as impetuous types.

Did I get that right?
Yes
Presumably most of the time if the bad guys in front are in charge range and you have shock troops then you would want to charge anyway. But if you decided to NOT charge then you would have to roll for each legionary battlegroup 1 by 1 and any that failed the test would have to charge whilst their colleagues would then NOT be allowed to charge as you already decided not to??
Exactly

If that is correct then if you have greater than 1 shock battlegroup together within charge range of a viable enemy it would be very risky NOT to let them charge straight away....
Risky but not suicidal. If your troops are drilled and have a general with them you will only be forced to charge on a roll of 4 on two dice so it's not that common. Undrilled troops without the direct control of a general are a different issue.
Please advise if I have misunderstood. I am OK with this if it is the rules, it just seems slightly unusual, I expected it to say "Undrilled" Shock troops charge if they fail a CMT....
Andy
The whole point of the rule is that some troops really want to get stuck in and Roman Legions are in that category. There are not many instances of Romans or phalangites closing with enemy foot and then just standing there.

If you really don't like it blame Nik, he apparently came up with the concept for DBM some time back.

Hammy
miffedofreading
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:00 pm
Location: Reading, England

Post by miffedofreading »

I can live with it. It's just that because it seemed strange there was a good chance I had misunderstood it :)
davidandlynda
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
Posts: 830
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 9:17 am

Post by davidandlynda »

Foot don't have to if they would contact mounted though ,hence my tactical plans at the weekend stand and shoot at pikes with LF,either they stand and risk further damage eventually the LF will break them if they stand and take it,alternatively they charge the skirmish line away and get broken up,if they do it singularly they will be isolated so the whole line has to move pulling them out of position,etc etc
The LF then come back and start all over again
David
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Re: Impetuous charges

Post by nikgaukroger »

hammy wrote:
If you really don't like it blame Nik, he apparently came up with the concept for DBM some time back.

Hammy
Its a fantastic mechanism 8)
trev
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:32 pm
Location: Southend-on-sea, Essex, UK
Contact:

Post by trev »

If I understand this right, my rules should arrive tomorrow, it sounds great. Impetuous legions at last!

Andy, it might help if you think that any troops whose doctrine is to get up close and personal with the enemy will need to be kept on a tight leash when near that enemy, or they will start doing what they were trained to do. Keeping control will be easier if your army has a decent officer corps and drills regularly but might still be a challenge even then. The desire to get things over with is a well documented urge for combat troops and the ability to endure close proximity to the enemy in silence is often the mark of truly exceptional soldiers. Caesar mentions his legions attacking without orders at least twice and Plutarch has Marius' Marsian auxiliaries doing the same a few years earlier. I'm sure I could recall other examples if I thought about it too.

Trev
Scrumpy
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1423
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: NoVa

Post by Scrumpy »

Jeeesh, not as if the Romans are not powerful enough already ! :lol:
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Trev - spot on, that is exactly the thinking behind the rule 8)
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”