Godendag build up

davidandlynda · Post by **davidandlynda** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:42 pm

Andy Bascombe is going to be stretched a bit playing with Bruce and Tim,
David

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 3:25 pm

davidandlynda wrote:Andy Bascombe is going to be stretched a bit playing with Bruce and Tim,
David

Good point, but I am sure he will do his best. I wonder if he knows he has been volunteered for 2 teams. I suspect that in reality Tim will be playing with Adam.

nikgaukroger · Post by **nikgaukroger** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:30 pm

madaxeman wrote:Our theory was take an army with a bit of everything in it as that might be a good way to learn the rules

Sounds like other people are somewhat beyond that stage

Not me, mate.

See you on bottom table

madaxeman · Post by **madaxeman** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:53 pm

I'm just hoping there isn't a free set of rules and lists on offer for the winners.

Apparently www.Madaxeman.com has so far been responsible for generating over 5% of Amazon.co.uk's total advance orders for FoG

and so I'd be gutted if I'd got so succesful that RBS and JD felt they had to resort to giving the thing away to undercut me !

http://madaxeman.com/FoGshop.htm

Tim

hammy · Post by **hammy** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:39 pm

list_lurker wrote:Simon and Terry win the best barbarian army title by default!

And how is a Slave revolt army not barbarian??

We are just escaped, partially Roman equiped barbarians after all.

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:49 pm

madaxeman wrote:I'm just hoping there isn't a free set of rules and lists on offer for the winners.

Let me be the first to reassure you.

list_lurker · Post by **list_lurker** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:08 am

And how is a Slave revolt army not barbarian??

And I thought they were all 'singers of songs' ?

neilhammond · Post by **neilhammond** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:44 pm

Richard,

Are you going to post the DBM runners and riders (on the DBM list?). Or do us old timers just have to wait and see?

Neil

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:32 pm

neilhammond wrote:Richard,

Are you going to post the DBM runners and riders (on the DBM list?). Or do us old timers just have to wait and see?

Neil

Never have done. Don't see any reason to start now

neilhammond · Post by **neilhammond** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:43 pm

rbodleyscott wrote: Never have done. Don't see any reason to start now

UMPIRE! Where's the umpire? There's clear bias here in favour of FOG.

davem · Post by **davem** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:16 am

So who the FOG won? Who was the FOGgiest link?

Have the players made it safely out of the Welsh FOG and mist?

shall · Post by **shall** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:20 am

Well it was stonking fun and tyhanks to Ricahrd for the organisation.

In our period

Winners : Bruce and Andy with Later Seleucid
Runners up : Me and Terry with Gallic

Some sort of proof that a HF barbarian army can cause some serious headaches in field of glory.

Si

ars_belli · Post by **ars_belli** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:34 pm

shall wrote:Some sort of proof that a HF barbarian army can cause some serious headaches in field of glory.

That's great to hear, Simon! Would you be willing to share a few details about the composition and disposition of your Gallic army?

Many thanks,

shall · Post by **shall** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:46 pm

For short version see other stream just posted

Longer version I hope to put on the AARs later in the week

Si

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:54 pm

In the Rise of the Ottomans period:

1st Andy Ellis and Bob Amey - Later Hungarian
2nd Brian O'Dea and Andy Whitby - Later Hungarian

nicofig · Post by **nicofig** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:12 pm

Later hungarian , a new killer ?

madaxeman · Post by **madaxeman** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:47 pm

Im currently sat in an airport looking at a 10 hour flight thinking "I wish I had some army list books so I could start to design an army for next time to take into account all I learnt this weekend..."

I think that this conclusively proves that these rules must have what it takes

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:22 am

nicofig wrote:Later hungarian , a new killer ?

Well it is good within theme. It remains to be seen how good it is in open tournaments.

Our Poles certainly didn't feel outmatched by them.

We drew one game and lost two against them. However, one of the defeats was entirely down to dice (we charged 4 BGs of 4 knights and 3 generals into 3 BGs of knights and 3 generals. End result: We routed 1 of their BGs and killed one of their generals, they routed all 4 of our BGs and killed all 3 of our generals). The other defeat was due to poor play on my part.

dave_r · Post by **dave_r** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:25 pm

Later hungarian , a new killer ?

We managed to beat both Hungarians we played (albeit narrowly) with Serbians.

I think the bottom line is that there isn't one particular "killer" army and that all armies are viable and can win if played with properly. In our case I think that means we always needed another half hour...

We both had great fun during the event though.

Godendag build up

Godedingdangdingdangdog..

Re: Godedingdangdingdangdog..