Battle Report: Later Medieval Germans vs Medieval French

Forum for anyone to post reports of their battles and pictures, otherwise known as After Action Reports.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
ssean13
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:02 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Battle Report: Later Medieval Germans vs Medieval French

Post by ssean13 »

Well I had another battle with my Later Medieval German army. This time against David Knizett's Medieval French. I forgot to take the camera, but I have drawn up some diagrams of the battle and taken photos of them instead.

In army list below, you can see replace the battle wagons and artillery and with an two additional two generals. My hope was the additional boast in combat, and increased command and control, would compensate for the small size of the army. I was proved right.

Image

As you can see from my deployment I decided to refuse my right flank, covering it only with my light horse. My Pike was to pin his centre, while my main thrust was on the left flank. However, I knew David had a flank march, but did not know which flank it was coming on and how many battle groups it had in it.

Image

The light horse moved up to delay his infantry armed with heavy weapons and attempt to disrupt them. They manage disrupt his infantry, but in return were fragmented by fire from his medium foot armed and light foot armed with with crossbows. They decided being in front of wall of crossbow was not healthy and that retreat was the best option.

My pike and heavy foot advanced rapidly up the centre. I wanted to get to grip with his six dismounted knights armed with heavy weapons, which I saw as the weakness in his line. My light foot armed with crossbows failed disrupt the dismounted knights. The pikes then burst though the light foot, disrupting the light foot. The pikes smashed into the dismounted knights. The pikes then proceeded grind down the dismounted knights armed with heavy weapons. The dismounted knights losing two bases of knights and becoming disrupted.

In response his eight infantry armed with heavy weapons charged my battle group of four infantry armed with heavy weapons. After short and bloody fight my battle group was overwhelmed and auto broke. The light foot tested for their cohesion, because of seeing friend's break, and rolled a two! Being ready disrupted they broke. Thankfully the pike passed their test for seeing friends breaks. Instead, it inspired the pike to greater efforts and they routed, pursued and then auto broke the dismounted knights.

My cavalry armed with crossbows moved up to shoot at his knights. They disrupted the knights, but his knights bolstered back up. His medium foot then charged. My cavalry successfully evaded his medium foot.

While this was happenng his knights charged my battle group of crossbows, disrupting them and destroying two bases. In response my cavalry armed crossbows charged both his knights and medium foot. Simultanously, a battle group of knights (which had a general attached), that had been racing round his unguarded left flank , smashed into the flank of the medium foot.

My battle group of crossbowmen then broke. I also lost two bases from my cavalry. While his medium foot became fragmented

At the sametime my battle group of six cavalry armed with lances charged his battle group of six cavalry armed with lances. In subsequent combat my battle group lost base and was disrupted. Then his battle group was disrupted.

While this was happening my light horse where bolstered back up to steady and my light foot managed to rally to fragmented.

Image

Then David finally rolled a 9 and flank march, one battle group of four knights, came on the left flank. But it was too late. His medium foot routed. My knights failed to catch his medium foot in the subsequent rout> However, my next impact phase my knights charged his knights in the centre in flank. This, combined with a charged from another battle group of knights, that had been in reserved behind my crossbow, broke his knights in the centre.

Image

At the point David conceded the battle. My Later Medieval Germans have proved themselves again, achieving another glorious victory.

Next time I promise not to forget the camera!
olivier
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1126
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 5:49 pm
Location: Paris, France

Post by olivier »

Nice battle report.
one advice, on the first column of the excel sheet with the last version you must use different number for each different BG. After that you can check the column and order it in increasing number anr you battle group will be displayed automatically.
5 general is a bit to much isn't it ? I think it was restrained to four. :wink:
ssean13
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:02 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by ssean13 »

5 general is a bit to much isn't it ? I think it was restrained to four. Wink
Actually this incorrect. The list says you can have one C in C, who can be a inspired, field or tactical commander. You can then have up to two general who are field commanders and up to three generals who are tactical commanders. These are cumulative.

So in theory you could have C in C and five generals. I have C in C, who is a tactical commander. I have one general who is a field commander and three generals who are tactical commanders i.e one C in C and four generals. This is all perfectly legal.
stevoid
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by stevoid »

Sorry Sean but the rules (not the individual lists) limit sub-commanders and ally generals to a 1-3 range. So with a CnC that's 4 tops.

Steve
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28322
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

stevoid wrote:Sorry Sean but the rules (not the individual lists) limit sub-commanders and ally generals to a 1-3 range. So with a CnC that's 4 tops.
Correct.

The ranges in the army lists have to be larger to allow a choice.
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory AAR's”