artilery
Moderators: terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design
-
ravenflight
- Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am
Re: artilery
I agree it seems odd that they get no advantage at close range, but that's the way the rules are written so I have to suck it up.grandad wrote:what advantage do you get from artilery. in the fog r rules as far as i can see you dont get any + (or extra dice) for shooting at close range
Artillery get the advantage of incredible range. I don't think I've played a game where arty DIDN'T fire on the first bound. They also give -ve modifiers to cohesion tests.
They are, in my opinion, quite worth the points.
-
timmy1
- Lieutenant-General - Nashorn

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England
Re: artilery
The thinking is that the historical use of artillery in this period did not include widespread use of short range anti-personal rounds such as grape and canister therefore when firing at a formed body of troops range does not make enough difference to be worth a PoA change at any point.
Re: artilery
don't get me wrong i think the fogr rules far better than say the WRG rule for this period that i used 20 odd years ago but i seamed to remember you used to get a bonus for artillery used at close range
-
quackstheking
- 1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18

- Posts: 844
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:41 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire, England
Re: artilery
Just goes to show how poor and unhistoric the WRG rules were (and I loved them at the time) - grapeshot in the 1600's? I don't think so!!!!
Don
Don
-
gibby
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am
- Location: Northampton
Re: artilery
Artillery is powerful enough and needs no short range bonus. Jim
-
Sarmaticus
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 4:31 pm
Re: artilery
It was used by Swedish 3pdrs in the 1630s - but they're RGs so the argument re the rules for bases of Artillery (rather than markers) still applies.quackstheking wrote:Just goes to show how poor and unhistoric the WRG rules were (and I loved them at the time) - grapeshot in the 1600's? I don't think so!!!!![]()
Don
