breaking off??
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
breaking off??
are yu limited to how many break offs you can do in a turn(not the same bg)
-
Robert241167
- Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D

- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:03 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: breaking off??
No limit grandad.
If BG's have to and can break off then they will all break off.
Rob
If BG's have to and can break off then they will all break off.
Rob
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: breaking off??
Break off is compulsory. If a BG that should break off cannot it drops a cohesion level
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Re: breaking off??
phil or saying a bg that can has too
-
zoltan
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser

- Posts: 901
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: breaking off??
Yes its compulsory unless another battlegroup has somehow trapped your bg in contact with enemy (I've never seen that happen but theoretically it could).grandad wrote:phil or saying a bg that can has too
Re: breaking off??
cheers
-
hazelbark
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
Re: breaking off??
Seen it a fair bit. Quite fun too.zoltan wrote:Yes its compulsory unless another battlegroup has somehow trapped your bg in contact with enemy (I've never seen that happen but theoretically it could).
Re: breaking off??
Sometimes you charge without orders and then conform into a position where your a friendly BG stops the break off. Nasty.
-
zoltan
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser

- Posts: 901
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: breaking off??
You let your bgs get into a risky situation like that?!Polkovnik wrote:Sometimes you charge without orders and then conform into a position where your a friendly BG stops the break off. Nasty.
Re: breaking off??
But since you get a chance to move your friendly BG out of the way in the movement phase, this shouldn't be a problem.Polkovnik wrote:Sometimes you charge without orders and then conform into a position where your a friendly BG stops the break off. Nasty.
Normally it is the opponent preventing the break off - I've done it on numerous occasions.
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
ravenflight
- Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am
Re: breaking off??
I'm not sure about V2, but I'be been in situs where cataphracts had to break off from MF spearmen. I couldn't because of that exact reason. Charged, conformed and was in front of my own troops who couldn't get out of the way. It depends on the troops, but in V1 undrilled 'practically anything' would have a difficult time getting from behind their own troops, esp since it's only a problem if they are <1" away, and so wheeling is going to cause issues (if you wheel correctly that is - which few people seem to do)dave_r wrote:But since you get a chance to move your friendly BG out of the way in the movement phase, this shouldn't be a problem.Polkovnik wrote:Sometimes you charge without orders and then conform into a position where your a friendly BG stops the break off. Nasty.
Normally it is the opponent preventing the break off - I've done it on numerous occasions.
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Re: breaking off??
In which case you're not thinking ahead enough. The move before, you should have thought "if I move my cataphracts there and my opponent reacts, will I end up in a daft position where I can't break off". Or you could put the IC with them to improve the chances of stopping them charging. Granted that undrilled troops are often clumsy. But that might be an issue of making sure that the other BG can also charge (and is of a type that wants to). Or just don't put clumsy troops that close to the cataphracts.ravenflight wrote:I'm not sure about V2, but I'be been in situs where cataphracts had to break off from MF spearmen. I couldn't because of that exact reason. Charged, conformed and was in front of my own troops who couldn't get out of the way. It depends on the troops, but in V1 undrilled 'practically anything' would have a difficult time getting from behind their own troops, esp since it's only a problem if they are <1" away, and so wheeling is going to cause issues (if you wheel correctly that is - which few people seem to do)dave_r wrote:But since you get a chance to move your friendly BG out of the way in the movement phase, this shouldn't be a problem.Polkovnik wrote:Sometimes you charge without orders and then conform into a position where your a friendly BG stops the break off. Nasty.
Normally it is the opponent preventing the break off - I've done it on numerous occasions.
-
zoltan
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser

- Posts: 901
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: breaking off??
Yes, that was essentially my point - anticip..............ation (queue Phil, "It's just a jump to the left...").grahambriggs wrote:In which case you're not thinking ahead enough. The move before, you should have thought "if I move my cataphracts there and my opponent reacts, will I end up in a daft position where I can't break off". Or you could put the IC with them to improve the chances of stopping them charging. Granted that undrilled troops are often clumsy. But that might be an issue of making sure that the other BG can also charge (and is of a type that wants to). Or just don't put clumsy troops that close to the cataphracts.
-
kevinj
- Major-General - Tiger I

- Posts: 2379
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
- Location: Derbyshire, UK
Re: breaking off??
I think you'll find Robert is your man here...anticip..............ation
Re: breaking off??
Well we all make mistakes sometimes. It's the sort of thing that happens once and then you make sure it doesn't happen again.grahambriggs wrote:In which case you're not thinking ahead enough. The move before, you should have thought "if I move my cataphracts there and my opponent reacts, will I end up in a daft position where I can't break off". Or you could put the IC with them to improve the chances of stopping them charging. Granted that undrilled troops are often clumsy. But that might be an issue of making sure that the other BG can also charge (and is of a type that wants to). Or just don't put clumsy troops that close to the cataphracts.Polkovnik wrote:Sometimes you charge without orders and then conform into a position where your a friendly BG stops the break off. Nasty.
Re: breaking off??
am i right a mounted unit of lancers attacks a steady unit of mf. the mf result in getting disrupted can the mounted unit choose either to break off or say?
-
Robert241167
- Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D

- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:03 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: breaking off??
Hi grandad
The mounted do not get a choice.
They have to break off or stay depending on whether the foot are steady or not.
Rob
The mounted do not get a choice.
They have to break off or stay depending on whether the foot are steady or not.
Rob
Re: breaking off??
sorry they will stay if they stay steady but if they inflict a hit they can choose??
Re: breaking off??
Mounted in contact with steady foot must break off. Mounted in contact with unsteady foot do not break off. If at least half the bases in front edge contact are steady foot, the mounted break off.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Re: breaking off??
They do not break off because the foot are not Steady. Breaking off is not a choice. If half or more the opponents are steady foot the lancers MUST break off. If not they CANT break off.grandad wrote:am i right a mounted unit of lancers attacks a steady unit of mf. the mf result in getting disrupted can the mounted unit choose either to break off or say?



