one minus against Heavily Armoured for bows?

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
thefrenchjester
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:23 pm
Location: the wilderness of mirrors

one minus against Heavily Armoured for bows?

Post by thefrenchjester »

Hi,

is it intentionnal that bow, sling and javelin have now only one" - " against Heavily Armoured instead of " -- " or a miss ?

thanks for your reply;

Best regards

thefrenchjester
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: one minus against Heavily Armoured for bows?

Post by philqw78 »

I think its a typo, mentioned in the errata thread above
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
thefrenchjester
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:23 pm
Location: the wilderness of mirrors

Re: one minus against Heavily Armoured for bows?

Post by thefrenchjester »

philqw78 wrote:I think its a typo, mentioned in the errata thread above
Hi Phil,

thanks for the advice, I missed the point;

Cheers.

Gilles
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”