Alexandrian Macedonian List Question

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
stevoid
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Alexandrian Macedonian List Question

Post by stevoid »

Hi,

The beta list allows for "heavy foot with pikes can instead be deployed as [sic] the start of the battle as medium foot with javelins as above" (my italics).

Does the "as above" mean as per the regrade options in the main list under optional troops? And, if so, does this mean that 6 point pikemen become 7 point light spear, swordsmen?

Cheers,

Steve
spike
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:12 pm
Location: Category 2

Re: Alexandrian Macedonian List Question

Post by spike »

stevoid wrote:Hi,

The beta list allows for "heavy foot with pikes can instead be deployed as [sic] the start of the battle as medium foot with javelins as above" (my italics).

Does the "as above" mean as per the regrade options in the main list under optional troops? And, if so, does this mean that 6 point pikemen become 7 point light spear, swordsmen?

Cheers,

Steve
I asked the umpire at britcon about this, as I was using Alexandrian. His reply was if you want the flexability of deploying the pike as either MF or HF you pay the cost of the more expensive troops. So it's 7 per element of the BG not 6, and you get freebie swap ability.

Spike
stevoid
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Alexandrian Macedonian List Question

Post by stevoid »

spike wrote:
stevoid wrote:Hi,

The beta list allows for "heavy foot with pikes can instead be deployed as [sic] the start of the battle as medium foot with javelins as above" (my italics).

Does the "as above" mean as per the regrade options in the main list under optional troops? And, if so, does this mean that 6 point pikemen become 7 point light spear, swordsmen?

Cheers,

Steve
I asked the umpire at britcon about this, as I was using Alexandrian. His reply was if you want the flexability of deploying the pike as either MF or HF you pay the cost of the more expensive troops. So it's 7 per element of the BG not 6, and you get freebie swap ability.

Spike
That would sound like a good anti-cheese ruling and you still get some list-based flexibility.

I wonder whether that will be included in the published form of the list? Hopefully the FOG team will advise

Cheers,

Steve
stevoid
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by stevoid »

PS - when re-deploying the pike, is it all must be re-deployed if any, or is that some can be re-deployed and others left as pike.

Cheers,

Steve
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

The list says "This option can only be used if they have been paid for at the points cost of the medium foot."
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Alexandrian Macedonian List Question

Post by rbodleyscott »

stevoid wrote:I wonder whether that will be included in the published form of the list?
It is
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

stevoid wrote:PS - when re-deploying the pike, is it all must be re-deployed if any, or is that some can be re-deployed and others left as pike.
Not specified as all/none, therefore optional.
stevoid
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by stevoid »

Thanks guys :-)

Nik - the beta lists we have don't say that so I presume you are talking about the finished product (which we are all looking forward to).

Steve
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

stevoid wrote:
Nik - the beta lists we have don't say that so I presume you are talking about the finished product (which we are all looking forward to).
I am indeed :D

Some of the beta lists are now quite a bit out of date.
stevoid
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by stevoid »

Further question on paying the extra points for Pike to be able to redeploy as MF, light spear, swordmen...

When exactly during the setting up of the game is the decision required to be made?

My first though was to treat as per dismounting mounted but this decision obviously has an affect on the total number of BGs, i.e. if a 12 base phalanx becomes 2 BGs and if you had a 12 BG army, then 3-3-3-3 could become 3-4-3-3.

Deciding when it is placed (or revealed from ambush if noted on the ambush marker as deployed as such) seems reasonable but the split into two BGs does make me wonder.

Steve
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

The list notes say they can be so deployed at the start of battle as MF - nothing about changing in the dismounting part of deployment.

The number of BG's is a good question and I suspect could do with a FAQ clarification.
stevoid
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by stevoid »

Thanks Nik. I would suggest that they make their choice then after terrain selection but before the start of any deployment which would also allow time to adjust BG deployment distribution accordingly (is that what you meant by start of battle?). Hopefully an author will clarify and maybe add to the FAQ or, as it is unpublished, the actual list.

Steve
stevoid
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by stevoid »

Hi to the FOG team,

Can I get an official clarification on when exactly the 'start of battle' is with regard to troops like Macedonian foot companions/hypaspists, who have paid the extra point, electing to grab a sword and shorten their pike to a javelin?

Cheers,

Steve
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

stevoid wrote:Hi to the FOG team,

Can I get an official clarification on when exactly the 'start of battle' is with regard to troops like Macedonian foot companions/hypaspists, who have paid the extra point, electing to grab a sword and shorten their pike to a javelin?

Cheers,

Steve
Here is what the list actually says:
 Foot companions and hypaspists listed in a player’s army list as heavy foot pikemen can instead be deployed at the start of the battle as medium foot with javelins – as in the army list below. A battle group of 12 heavy foot bases becomes two battle groups of 6 medium foot bases, a battle group of 8 heavy foot bases becomes a battle group of 8 medium foot bases. This option can only be used if they have been paid for at the points cost of the medium foot.
Clear enough?
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

To add to Richard's post I think "deployed at the start of the battle" is clearly when troops are put on table - "deploy battle groups" is a stage in the setting up the game sequence.
stevoid
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by stevoid »

Ta, from Nik's earlier post I wasn't sure whether it was during deployment or at the very start during initiative dicing etc, but I guess I missed the emphasis on "deployed" and worried about a definition of "start of battle" :oops:

Steve
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”