Questionable Support

Moderators: terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design

Post Reply
daveallen
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Posts: 542
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:21 am

Questionable Support

Post by daveallen »

Imagine three battle groups in line and adjacent to each other, two six base pike and shot on the outside and between them two bases of artillery.

Behind the artillery is another pike and shot bg supporting it. Does it support all three front line units?

I ask because the supporting bg is notionally level with the front line pike and shot.

Dave
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Re: Questionable Support

Post by kevinj »

I think the second bullet on P126 resolves this "a battle group in a position to give rear support to artillery is treated for all purposes as if its front edge was in the position of the front edge of the artillery".

Clearly, this means it cannot be "entirely behind a straight line extending the rear edge of the supported battle group" as required by P174.
Last edited by kevinj on Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Questionable Support

Post by rbodleyscott »

kevinj wrote:I think the second bullet on P126 resolves this "a battle group in a position to give rear support to artillery is treated for all purposes as if its front edge was in the position of the front edge of the artillery".

Clearly, this means it cannot be "entirely behind a straight line extending the front edge of the supported battle group" as required by P174.
REAR edge.
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Re: Questionable Support

Post by kevinj »

Oops, copy error! Fixed.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”