Competitive Armies

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
GKChesterton1976
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:27 am

Competitive Armies

Post by GKChesterton1976 »

Has playtest or competition to date revealed certain armies or classes of armies that are very dominant in a competitive sense? Or has the quality of play and the players insight not yet developed to a stage where it is clear what is likely to be best in tough competition play?

Adrian
jlopez
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 589
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Competitive Armies

Post by jlopez »

tamerlane wrote:Has playtest or competition to date revealed certain armies or classes of armies that are very dominant in a competitive sense? Or has the quality of play and the players insight not yet developed to a stage where it is clear what is likely to be best in tough competition play?

Adrian
I´ve played against Late Medieval German, Alexandrian Macedonian, Medieval Irish and Ottoman Turks with my Latin Greece army (Romanian Frank in DBM) and I felt that all armies had more or less an equal chance of winning.

I think flexible armies in the hands of good players have an advantage but I also feel that a poor player with a solid, no-nonsense army (Hoplites, Scots Common) deployed and used historically has more than a reasonable chance of winning. Overall, it seems to be very well balanced.

Julian
shall
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 6137
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:52 am

Post by shall »

Paluy testing so far has singularly failed to find any super armies. I have used 40+ now and would be ahppy tot ake any of them to a comp. What you do need to do is design with a plan in mind and adapt tactics quite widely for the different typs of troops.

Si
bddbrown
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 376
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:49 am

Post by bddbrown »

It is fair to say there are some armies that are easier to play from outset than others. Looking deeper into that there are armies that are initially easier to win or easier not to lose with initially as well as armies that become more competitive over time.

For example Pike armies are a good starting army, but don't tend to be easy to win with until you've figured them out. Shooty cavalry armies are good to start with, but soon become vulnerable to experienced players.

Fortunately at the moment we are in the early stages of all those army curves - so anything is fair game!

Although I still think some armies are really hard work - Guals, Ancient Britons and Early Germans spring to mind. Sure you can win with them, but not even Simon struggles with the Ancient Britons.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”