allocating dices for disorder

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
franck
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:08 pm

allocating dices for disorder

Post by franck »

I have a doubt on the following :
- :D (facing up) a Cv by 4 fighting, in its front against another unit :shock: (facing down)
- an ennemy El :mrgreen: (facing down) overaps the Cv
as disorder applies to bases and not to full BG, only 2 bases of the Cv (close to El) are affected, so still gets 4 dices during melee :

:shock: :shock: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
:D :D
:D :D

It is correct ?

franck
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: allocating dices for disorder

Post by philqw78 »

Yes, disorder by bases so no loss of dice
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Re: allocating dices for disorder

Post by bbotus »

And, the authors stated somewhere in here that this was intentionally done. That way a unit fighting the elephants would lose dice but a friendly cav unit supporting the elephants would only have 2 stands disordered and therefore not affected by the elephants. This simulates the idea that the friendly horses were used to working with the elephants but no actual rule is needed.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”