Uhu wrote:Very interesting information, thanks for it!
chris10 wrote:
..after the lend lease really took effect and the russian industry was pulling out more and more cheap and quick-made equipment made by forced labor (those who didnt work did not got food stamps) while mass conscripting division after division riding US trucks,wearing US made uniforms and boots while eating US made canned food...Until today It is totally hushed up and ignored in Russia what the impact of the lend lease really was and those who studied the original contracts and deliverys will be gobsmacked about the sheer amount of material (over 500.000 US trucks,over 2000 ! locomotives) which in fact were responsible for keeping up the russian logistics in the war industry otherwise the factorys would not have been able to produce these amounts cause where there is no transport there is no production...as a comparison the russian production of locomotives for 1941 was 90 !!..same goes for class A plane fuel..Russia had oil but was unable to refine the fuel needed for their air force just like the arabic countrys today produce oil but have to import fuel as they dont produce fuel...Literally all class A plane fuel from 1942 onwards was US delivered and the list goes on and on...
Whether Russia would've lost without Lend-Lease will be debated forever. All of the points you made are very good and absolutely true. The trucks, the foods, the aviation fuel, rare minerals, locomotives, clothing, all were incredibly helpful. What isn't obvious, however, is whether the Russians would've lost without Lend-Lease. I do think Lend-Lease allowed the Russians to produce many more pure military items like tanks and artillery, but I think they would've produced other goods at the expense of tanks/guns if they didn't receive the same level of Lend-Lease aid. They moved entire factories in 1941 to the Urals. They lost 6 million soldiers 40% of their industry in the first six months of the war. Such losses would've destroyed almost any other country.
Yes, the Russians were incredibly boastful and think they single-handedly won the war, which is exaggeration to put it mildly. The aid they received, at minimum, sped the process up several years, and very likely was critical to victory. Yet, at the same time, most people in the West are very dismissive of the Russians because of Cold War thinking. All you ever hear about in America is D-Day, most people have no idea what happened in Eastern Europe for 4 years. There was always a tendency to underestimate Russia, and people from Napoleon to Hitler have made that mistake. I just think, in aiming for a historically accurate campaign, credit should be given where credit is due. And the Russians deserve a lot of credit for their role in winning WWII.