Obsolete

[ericdoman1]

Division A

ericdoman1 Early Crusader 1098 – 1099 AD (33/50) vs Fedem Ghaznavid (42/41)

Another incredibly tough game, lasting 16 turns.

One amazing combat result. Some knights of mine anarchy charged into def spears of Federico's. He does 81 casualties to me, I do 35% in return. 81 is defininitely the highest individual unit total for me and also teh combined total is a record

[ericdoman1]

Whoops Fedem won initiative

[batesmotel]

Division A

ericdoman1 Early Crusader 1098 – 1099 AD (33/50) vs Fedem Ghaznavid (42/41)

Another incredibly tough game, lasting 16 turns.

One amazing combat result. Some knights of mine anarchy charged into def spears of Federico's. He does 81 casualties to me, I do 35% in return. 81 is defininitely the highest individual unit total for me and also teh combined total is a record

Is that 81 casualties or 81%? The maximum you should be able to take for losing in combat is 28% which is the max for taking 6 hits more than you gave which should only be possible in impact against missile foot. Even 35% casualties is out of the range listed for possible losses from a single combat according to the help. I think nominal BG strength is 300 so 81 would be close to the maximum 28% casualties and 35 around 12%, which are both within the ranges listed in the help. I assume your knights lost the combat. If those were actually percentages that you saw, they need to be reported as a bug in the support forum.

Chris

[Aristides]

Div B

Me: 44/35; epos: 26/41

Damn it - is there a way to tell post-battle who had initiative (I mean besides having enough of a brain to remember whether you chose it or not)?

[ericdoman1]

It was 81 and 39 casualties. My mistake. Had a quick look, I was on 230 casualties/77% when I charged in and after combat I was on 150/50% so a 27% loss. However 81/230 = 35.2%

[batesmotel]

It was 81 and 39 casualties. My mistake. Had a quick look, I was on 230 casualties/77% when I charged in and after combat I was on 150/50% so a 27% loss. However 81/230 = 35.2%

I believe that % losses are % of original strength, e.g.% of 300, not of current strength.

Chris

[FedeM]

Division B

Fedem Ordonnance Burgundian 22/35 vs Tiavals Timurids 35/32.

Lost Initiative.

Although we had to fight on one of the maps with more bad ground I've seen we were able to prevail. It took 16 turns of good tactics, patience and scratching my head.
Tough battle.
Cheers!

[ericdoman1]

yep makes sense

[porsenna]

Hi people- battle is posted for div C medieval vs early irish
pw=ireland

good luck challenger!

[FedeM]

Division B

Challenge issued for martog.

Password "martog"

Good luck.

[DarkOmen]

Gentlemen I have 2 challenges up PW- grudge if anyone wants them

[solly]

a mistake by me! I play with wars of the roses yorkist pretender instead of tudor . . . Sorry! . . . And now? I don't now. Help me please

I play this game: solly wars of the roses yorkist pretender (38/48) dav956 swiss (burgundian war) (36/31) iniziative yorkist


And now I play against epos with same error!

[stockwellpete]

a mistake by me! I play with wars of the roses yorkist pretender instead of tudor . . . Sorry! . . . And now? I don't now. Help me please

I play this game: solly wars of the roses yorkist pretender (38/48) dav956 swiss (burgundian war) (36/31) iniziative yorkist


And now I play against epos with same error!

Solly, unfortunately somebody else is using the Yorkist Pretender army in this division, so I think the best thing is to treat your match against dav956 as a friendly and for you to replay it using the correct army. I don't know how far you have got with your game against epos but again that should be treated as a friendly now and you should re-start with the correct army. Don't worry about it - it is just a mistake and you have plenty of time to play the extra game(s). Please contact dav956 as soon as you can to re-arrange your match.

Pete (convenor for medieval section)

[epos]

Div B

Me: 44/35; epos: 26/41

Damn it - is there a way to tell post-battle who had initiative (I mean besides having enough of a brain to remember whether you chose it or not)?

epos had the initiative ! well played "Aristides" !

[massina_nz]

If anyone wants to follow my games in Div A head to the AAR section.

[ericdoman1]

Hi

miverson, pw = matt
gazxtrix, pw = gazxtrix
batesmotel, pw = batesmotel

Cheers

[ericdoman1]

So I do not forget

won initiative vs davouthojo
lost initiative to massina and to IDS

[hidde]

Div B

Me: 44/35; epos: 26/41

Damn it - is there a way to tell post-battle who had initiative (I mean besides having enough of a brain to remember whether you chose it or not)?

The initiativ is sorted but I feel I must ask you to confirm the result.
I ask because it says in the rules that the winner should report. So to be sure there is no mix-up and you are the winner I need a confirmation.

8. Reporting Games
Reporting results will be incumbent on the player who won the battle. They will be required to log into the Slitherine Forum and post the result publically on the appropriate thread (e.g. Classical Battle Results). Results posted should be reported in the following format;

Division (A/B/C etc.)
Player ID (army) (BG lost / BG total) vs Player ID (army) (BG lost / BG total)

Example
Division A
pantherboy (Later Seleucid) (25/23) vs CharlesRobinson (Late Republican Roman) (14/23)

The next step is to update the online spreadsheets. We have posted links to online spreadsheets for each of the leagues within the “Temp League Results & Tables” thread under the post for this league. Each link will take you to a series of spreadsheets detailing each division table plus another sheet showing the ladder. What this means is that tables and ladders will always be up-to-date as long as results have been recorded.

Remeber to go to the spreadsheet as well and fill in the result... it's not in place yet but we're working on it

[Turk1964]

Division B

Turk1964 Early Crusader 1098-1099AD (30/47 )vs Iandavidsmith Arabs( 43/38 )

Ian won the initiative

Thanks for a great game Ian

Cheers Turk

[Aristides]

I won and posted the result - or did you mean confirm who had initiative? I agree with epos!