Morris vs Joe Rock

After action reports for Commander Europe at War.

Moderators: rkr1958, Happycat, Slitherine Core

Post Reply
Clark
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:44 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Clark »

Diplomaticus wrote:I'm starting a new thread to continue the above debate (getting a bit off-topic for this AAR).
Smart, especially since Joe Rock might have something to say on the topic before this game ends!
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Morris »

Feb 19th 1942 severe winter

Uralsk come to the fourth turn of severe winter . We lost a INF & one panzer & one Minor Mech badly hurt . We launch a counterattack to finish a USSR INF to make a space for the new reinforcement . We reinforce 2 Mech to the Uralsk bloc . It seems difficult for the Red Army to destroy my Uralsk group before spring . We will hold until fair turn will come no matter how much we need to sacrify ! It is said the darkest time is the moment before sunrise . I believe we have passed the darkest time . :)

situation at the start of this turn


Image

situation after Axis's move


Image
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Morris »

Mar 9th 1942 severe winter

Uralsk compaign comes to the fifth severe winter turn . The wounded panzer dead but he did not lost his position sothat the reinforcement was able to take the position . Also the minor Mech badly hurt again ,but still hold by 1 step left . At present most of our Mech & Arm are recovering to blue . Maybe there will be another severe winter turn , but I have no worry about that . What I am thinking now is what will be the destination of Axis in 1942 .


situation at the start


Image



situation after Axis's move


Image
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Morris »

Mar 29th 1942 severe winter

Urlask compaign continue ,Maybe it is the last severe winter turn , Russians gave up the effort of the severe winter offense & retreat back to prepare for their defence for Axis 1942 case blue .

We lost nothing but the one step hungary Mech . But all Germans have recovered for a fight . Only wait for the fair weather .


Situation at the start of this turn

Image



Situation after Axis's move


Image
Peter Stauffenberg
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4745
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Peter Stauffenberg »

How is your oil level with so many panzers, mechs and air units?
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Morris »

Stauffenberg wrote:How is your oil level with so many panzers, mechs and air units?
around 600 .
richardsd
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:30 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by richardsd »

I wouldn't imagine oil would be an issue the captured oil fields and relatively little air activity else where
Kragdob
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 683
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:55 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Kragdob »

Does it show that Germans can withstand Soviets in SW in supply 3 zone in clear terrain and no river? Or are the Soviets playing bad?
Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.
Diplomaticus
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 447
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:10 pm

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Diplomaticus »

Kragdob wrote:Does it show that Germans can withstand Soviets in SW in supply 3 zone in clear terrain and no river? Or are the Soviets playing bad?
JoeRock is one of our elite players, and I don't put myself in his league; but at the same time as I look at this AAR (Monday morning quarterback), I find myself questioning some of his choices, both early in the deployment of the Red Army in the face of Barbarossa and here during the winter offensive. I just don't see the profit in bashing your head against that brick wall at Uralsk. But then, a) Joe sees the big picture, while we get only screen shots and b) Joe is smarter than I am, so he probably made the best choice for the situation.
Peter Stauffenberg
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4745
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Peter Stauffenberg »

We also have to remember that this game is a bit special. Barbarossa started as early as April 1941 and it's being played with pre-RC11 rules. So there are were no rail heads and truck supply to worry about when Morris stormed eastwards. He could rail units from everywhere on the map directly to cities captured the previous turn.

The new rail rules means that the Axis armor spearheads will have to work by themselves more before the corps units catch up.

I'm pretty certain that duplicating Morris'es performance in this game will be very hard. So Joe was handed a very tricky situation and is fighting an uphill battle. I guess in future games Morris will not get further than Stalingrad and Maikop in 1941.
kaigab73
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:03 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by kaigab73 »

Stauffenberg wrote:
The new rail rules means that the Axis armor spearheads will have to work by themselves more before the corps units catch up.

I'm pretty certain that duplicating Morris'es performance in this game will be very hard. So Joe was handed a very tricky situation and is fighting an uphill battle. I guess in future games Morris will not get further than Stalingrad and Maikop in 1941.
the same rule applies to russians when they attack in '43-'45?
Cybvep
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1259
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:38 pm

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Cybvep »

Which is good, because 1941 should be decisive, not game-ending. IRL the Soviets "played" terribly and the Germans still didn't manage to take Moscow or Leningrad. Arguably, they could have been able to conquer Moscow/Leningrad if they concentrated their efforts on just one of these two cities, but it's doubtful that they would be able to take both and definitely not if they concentrated on Ukraine. Reaching Stalingrad in 1941 should be a feat in itself.
Peter Stauffenberg
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4745
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Peter Stauffenberg »

kaigab73 wrote:
Stauffenberg wrote:
The new rail rules means that the Axis armor spearheads will have to work by themselves more before the corps units catch up.

I'm pretty certain that duplicating Morris'es performance in this game will be very hard. So Joe was handed a very tricky situation and is fighting an uphill battle. I guess in future games Morris will not get further than Stalingrad and Maikop in 1941.
the same rule applies to russians when they attack in '43-'45?
Yes
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Morris »

Apr 18th 1942 fair weather

Uralsk compaign severe winter part is over . We hold sucessfully around Uralsk sothat we get a very good start point in 1942's offense . Last turn ,the red army retreated wisely , but we can not let them run away easily . We move forward not only in the south of Russia but also in the north to Moscow . It is too early to celebrate for the victory but it is time for germans to enjoy their happy hours after suffered the first severe winter in Russia .


Situation at the start of this turn


Image



offense in the south


Image



offense in the north


Image
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Morris »

May 8th 1942 fair

Russian began to retreat all over the map to make a defensive line around Moscow & Kuibychev . We move forward & start our attack . We arrive the suburb of Moscow & Kuibychev which were the political center in real 1942 . Also our INF sucessfully double cut off the link from Moscow to Caucasus .

In Med , our Italian sentinel sub sent out a warn message of a huge allies fleet & transport before his death . They are sailing to Italy ! We will give a medal to the Italian sub for his great job !

In west , UK began to bomb europe by their STR . but we can afford for that .

Situation at the start of this turn (north line)

Image


Situation at the start of this turn (south line)


Image



situation after Axis 's move


Image



Image


double cut off


Image



Allies fleet to Italy


Image
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Morris »

May 28th 1942 fair

Russians continue their retreat to Omsk direction . We take Kuibychev,Saratov & Tula & 2nd Baku . I think Russia will meet a choice of Moscow & Omsk . Maybe they will have to quit one .

In med , Allies seems will launch an early Torch . We can do nothing to stop them . Poor Vichy France .

In the west , STR bomb continue . Paris & Lorrien bombed . Paris's production decrease to yellow 4 .


situation at the start of this turn ( north line)


Image


situation at the start of this turn ( south line)



Image



Med situation 1



Image




Med situation 2


Image



After Axis's move in Russia (north line)


Image




After Axis's move in Russia ( south line)


Image
teamgene
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:24 pm

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by teamgene »

As a new player I find that this has some great stuff in it, keep it coming!


On debates..... 41 supply issue and change of gauge is dependant on how many trains are captured. In RL Germans were more successful in capturing russian trains and rail cars in the south, than other areas. There was no change of gauge beyond Kharkov, so why is Morris deep penetration an issue?
Operation Sealion...in 1940 Churchill might have wanted to continue the war from Canada if he got out. But I seriously doubt that UK and the Common Wealth would have been that interested. They would have been like France, wanting to move on and restore an economy. The real question is what would Roosevelt done and would it have been too much too soon?
Peter Stauffenberg
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4745
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Peter Stauffenberg »

Here are interesting links to the discussion about rail gauge conversion:

http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=2304

http://www.feldgrau.com/dreichsbahn.html

Both links indicate that the major obstacle for the Germans was NOT the actual conversion of the rail track, but that the Russian trains were bigger and could have a longer distance between stations where they refuel coal, water, make repairs etc. So Germany had to build such facilities long the captured tracks to support their own trains.

Here is a synopsis from one of the links:
According to the Reichsbahn official in charge when later interviewed by the Americans, the problem wasn't so much the changing of the gauge, which was accomplished in a simple way - pull up the spike, move the rail, respike it. The main problem was that Soviet locomotives were bigger than their Western counterparts and could carry more water, coal etc. This meant that they required fewer service stops. Apparently, the Germans had to build, on average, one full service station with water-towers, sidlings etc between every two Soviet ones in existence, for which no preparations existed.
Cybvep
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1259
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:38 pm

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Cybvep »

The in-game strategic result is the same - you have to wait a bit before the railways become fully operational. If it was a tactical game, then there would be a big difference between building more stops/wagons and converting railways, but in a grand strategy game - not really. We have to keep the abstract nature of CEAW in mind - you don't even have to build "wagons" or "trucks" in-game, i.e. you do not spend any PP on them. It is reasonable to assume that the PPs you have are the "final" value, so most logistical costs are already covered and the only strategic factor remaining is time.
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Re: Morris vs Joe Rock

Post by Morris »

June 17th 1942 fair weather

In Russia ,Joe just stay & supply ,so I ignore the start screen shot of Russia . We keep move forward , we take Penza , Ulyannovsk , & Ufa .We also make a detour to encircle Moscow & try to cut the link between Moscow & Omsk .

In Med , Allies launched Torch sucessfully . They take almost all NA in one turn with the help of the huge Allies Navy .Where will be the next ?

In west , Paris was bombed to red 1 . We have no FTR in the west , all of them are busy in the east .


Situation in the north Russia after Axis's move :


Image


Situation in central east Russia (maybe north) after Axis Move :


Image



Great Torch in NA


Image
Post Reply

Return to “Commander Europe at War : AAR's”