Western Europe:

Germany:

Italy:

Moderators: firepowerjohan, Happycat, rkr1958, Slitherine Core
No, but the resource terrain modifier is the same except the armor penalty. Resources have better flak as well.ncali wrote:It looks great! I really like this change. What did you end up doing with the rail depots such as Cherkasy and Kaluga that are in forest. Do they get the terrain modifiers for forest? The same goes for Cernati, Brunn, and Graz in the rough terrain?
No, they get max entrenchment 2 as mines and oilfields. So rail depots will be exactly like these resources unless we alter the values in terrain.txt.JimR wrote:Adding El-Arish in the Sinai on the Mediterranean coast would reflect the British railroad line that linked Egypt and Palestine.
Will these rail depots count as cities for entrenchment purposes? (Apologies if the question has been asked and answered already elsewhere.)
That's a good idea and we can certainly add one of them. Which of these cities were the most important as a rail line. Did the rail line from Germany to Italy go via Innbruck or Salzburg?Schnurri wrote:How about Innsbruck or Salzburg to reflect the "Alpine Redoubt", which never materialized but could have.
Yes, adding Aqaba can certainly be possible.Schnurri wrote:Possible addition of Aqaba as port at head of Gulf of Aqaba with transit possible to Red Sea and Persian Gulf?
Remember that Finnish units get +1 defense while inside core Finnish units. Joensuu is not big enough to be a city with the new city size limits we have. Let's test it out and see how things go. If the Soviets crush the Finns too early we can then think of something.Schnurri wrote:Should Joensuu remain a city for defensive purposes?
Thanks. Then we can add InnsbruckSchnurri wrote:I believe Innsbruck to Bolzano would be the main rail line to Italy.
Will it actually matter since Cherbourg and Rouen can cover most of the hexes in the Caen area anyway?Schnurri wrote:How about adding Caen?