Swordsmen vs. Swordsmen +

[TJD]

I'm not clear on the differences between Swordsmen and Swordsmen +. Can someone help me out?

Thanks!

Tim

[CheAhn]

SW+ are at an advantage versus foot SW and HW, otherwise no difference

cheers

[stockwellpete]

I'm not clear on the differences between Swordsmen and Swordsmen +. Can someone help me out?

Thanks!

Tim

You reminded me of this, TJD . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEtPluUi0_U

Definitely swordsmen+ versus swordsmen in this clip . . . but I think they might have been using the current FOG melee casualty calculations to come up with the result!

[TJD]

You reminded me of this, TJD . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEtPluUi0_U

Definitely swordsmen+ versus swordsmen in this clip . . . but I think they might have been using the current FOG melee casualty calculations to come up with the result!

Aha! I get the point now, Stockwellpete, just like Tim Roth did in that clip (though I guess he got more than just the point; he took the whole slicing edge as well.) What a great scene that is.

Thx,

Tim

[deeter]

Most likely, FOG 2.0 will do away with SW+, something I applaud. It make Romans too powerfull against Gauls, etc, and costs an extra useless point against everyone else.

Deeter