Why has the PG rule:"prestige for destroyed" aband

airbornemongo101 · Post by **airbornemongo101** » Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:39 pm

VPaulus wrote:
rezaf wrote:Many developers had the opportunity to revisit classics and try to improve on them in meaningful ways. You just did it and remade PG, not only once but twice, technically, and improved on it - sometimes in ways I disagree with, but at least you tried and succeeded. For that, you cannot be praised enough.
Hear, hear.

+1

rezaf · Post by **rezaf** » Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:43 pm

VPaulus wrote:
rezaf wrote:Many developers had the opportunity to revisit classics and try to improve on them in meaningful ways. You just did it and remade PG, not only once but twice, technically, and improved on it - sometimes in ways I disagree with, but at least you tried and succeeded. For that, you cannot be praised enough.
Hear, hear.

Heh, yeah, I guess I fell out of my role for a minute there. I'll try to keep such incidences at a minimum.

_____
rezaf

VPaulus · Post by **VPaulus** » Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:50 pm

rezaf wrote:Heh, yeah, I guess I fell out of my role for a minute there. I'll try to keep such incidences at a minimum.

Well but it's true. I've been playing computer games (didn't said video games) since the beginning of time. Most of the times, those remakes are not even able to replicate the feeling and much less to improve. Specially nowadays.